Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Some dumb questions

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Some dumb questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Aug 2008, 13:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Avon, CT, USA
Age: 68
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some dumb questions

1) What exactly is a B737NG, is it an EFIS glass cockpit setup? Is it the -700, -800 models?

2) I was looking at some technical system docs for A320, I like the redundancy/backups for the FBW. Is this whole aircraft more complex than the Apollo space capsule? 250 hour pilots can get type rated in it, can they learn all the systems for the check-ride?
ATPMBA is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 14:35
  #2 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The B737NG is the latest version of the B737 with advanced glass cockpit similar, but not as complex as the B747-400. It is versions -600 to -900.

The Apollo capsule was a 1968 moon orbit machine, with about as much computing power as a toaster. The Airbus is many large computers riveted together. They are different things. You need to do a 14 day course to understand the systems to be able to operate it effectively (after many simulator sessions). Boeing pilots say even that is not enough.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 14:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People are often surprised by how little computing power there was (and is) in some space craft.

The shuttle used to use Z80 processors (think your first computer from the 1980s those who are that old) for a few reasons: reliable, almost indestructable, all bugs known, resiliant to cosmic rays etc etc - and you don't nee that much power to make flight trajectory calculations (sliderulers anyone?)

It takes more computing resources to draw the displays than to compute the trajectory of the aircraft

fc101
fc101 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2008, 15:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
ATPMBA.

737NG means "Boeing 737 New Generation"
Old generation means -100 to -500 series.
New generation means -600 to -900 series.

NG has a completely revised wing (many with winglets on the tips),advanced electronic flight instrumentation, and improvements in many other systems.

Hope this helps.
dixi188 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2008, 23:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Right seat
Age: 44
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NG stands for Next Generation
danishdynamite is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2008, 23:35
  #6 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Some dumb questions

If I may be permitted to push the Tech Log party line again ... there are NO dumb questions ... but, sometimes people are dumb and fail to ask the questions to which they need the answer ...
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2008, 13:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i agreaa wit John Tullomarine

No question is a stupid question if they dont know the answer.....
Flightless Falcon is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2008, 15:23
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Avon, CT, USA
Age: 68
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NG

NG - Next Generation???

Boeing has bad marketing, most follks think NG stands for NO GOOD.
ATPMBA is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2008, 15:27
  #9 (permalink)  
kijangnim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Greetings,

NGs, Are they not FBW as opposed to the other models?
 
Old 23rd Aug 2008, 05:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry JT, but i disagree..... this is the dumbest question that i have ever read on Pprune.....

http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/34012...t-manuals.html


Mutt
mutt is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2008, 08:59
  #11 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Mutt ... with my pilot hat on ... I would tend to agree .. but, with a teaching hat ... perhaps it is just an opportunity ?
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2008, 10:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Farnborough, UK
Age: 72
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation The shuttle used to use Z80 processors

fc101
The shuttle used to use Z80 processors (think your first computer from the 1980s those who are that old) for a few reasons: reliable, almost indestructable, all bugs known, resiliant to cosmic rays etc etc - and you don't nee that much power to make flight trajectory calculations (sliderulers anyone?)
No - it used IBM AP-101 cpus (as also used in B52s). Shuttle procurement was complete in the early 70s, and Zilog only announced the Z80 in '76, I think.
Not that a Z80 would have been considered in any case.

Good myth, though!

klog (IBMer)
klog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.