Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

LNAV/VNAV non-precision approach on Boeings???

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

LNAV/VNAV non-precision approach on Boeings???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jun 2008, 20:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: on the way...
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LNAV/VNAV non-precision approach on Boeings???

Dear colleagues,

Don’t you know, is it necessary to have some special CAA approval to fly LNAV/VNAV non-precision approaches with B737 in UK or another EU countrie?

Last edited by relax.jet; 8th Jun 2008 at 21:12.
relax.jet is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 21:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure about the CAA regs, many Jepp plates have a ball note to the effect that approved operators can use a lower published DH in lieu of the MDA or some such thing. I`m sure someone will clarify that!
flite idol is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 21:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the US the operator would need to have their respective Ops Specs annotated so as to allow these procedures to be used. This would in turn assure compliance with the specific aircraft and equipment being utilized, i.e., Pegasus, PIP, GPS, Non GPS. Also the training program used to qualify the flight crews. I would imagine something simialr exists in GB as well.
Spooky 2 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 22:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Over the Moon
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes you do need CAA approval and you also require an appropriate training program for your pilots prior to be up and running.
Ashling is online now  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 23:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course, if we look back in time (say, ten years or so), we find the following...
Lockheed L1011.
Equipped with Honeywell HT9100 dual FMS/GPS units.
Fully certified for, enroute, terminal, approach (...ie; NPA).......and they worked to perfection.
And, still do.

Last edited by 411A; 9th Jun 2008 at 07:54.
411A is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2008, 23:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Well it's an IRS nowdays, but the AHRS were fun.
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LNAV/VNAV approaches fly to a DA (decision altitude) rather than an MDA (Minimum Descent Altitude). I currently fly these approaches under the US FAA part 135 (Gulfstream GIV) and yes the operator has to be approved. Same in other countries too.
#1AHRS is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 06:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess it depends on the local authority how they handle that stuff. We got minimal training (just flying one LNAV/VNAV or IAN approach during normal SIM checks) and are approved to fly them down to MDA serving as a DA for non precision approaches. Only restriction is that we have to use the autopilot on approaches with an RNP of 0.15 or lower until visual reference is aquired during the approach.

Of course IAN makes it even easier as you fly the NPA absolutely the same way as you do ILSs with the exception that you can only use one autopilot.
Denti is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 10:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney NSW
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ht9100

This unit was not specific to the L1011 though. Fitted to a number of a/c including large and small Boeings, some M-Ds and early Airbus. I can't remember exactly raving about it. I have one mid-atlantic airfield in mind that has a non-precision approach with an offset TACAN and an NDB in the most useless place other than to indicate where a decent steak might be had. The approach lights there always looked pink but the tea and banana cake was worth the trip. Without wishing to provoke an A vs B argument the MMI A330 that used to go there always seemed to have a better approach than many.
enicalyth is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 10:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wish it was warmer
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a quick question to the guys approved to fly LNAV/VNAV approaches.

What means do you use to correct for low temperatures during winter operations?

We are not allowed to fly them due to the fact that we are not allowed to do corrections to the vertical profile of the published fms-(fmgc)fixes.

Do you have a specific temp-range you are allowed to fly them, or does the profile change if you put in current temperature of the field in the fms (fmgc)?
ColdnFoggy is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 23:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,346
Received 22 Likes on 11 Posts
LNAV/VNAV approaches should have the lowest valid AD temperature annotated on the chart.
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 23:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Land of Ice and Fire
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OUr latest software updates make the height corrections automatically, when we put the aerodrome conditions into the approach section of the FMS....pretty cool. That allows us to use them!
FerrypilotDK is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2008, 23:55
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Re “…make the height corrections automatically”, but whatever cleverness the software has, it still depends on an accurate input. Similarly, doesn’t the generation of VNAV waypoints also depend on setting the correct QNH.
So VNAV is a more accurate system, but there are just as many if not more opportunities for error; - a need for good crosschecking SOPs and always select EGPWS terrain display on one display.
PEI_3721 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2008, 09:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lnav/vnav

EASA has just published draft material covering approvals for RNP APCH (LNAV/VNAV to RNP 0.3) and for RNP AR APCH (LNAV/VNAV to RNP 0.1 with fixed radius turns in final/missed) See
http://www.easa.eu.int/ws_prod/r/r_npa.php
LLLK is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 19:17
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: on the way...
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OUr latest software updates make the height corrections automatically, when we put the aerodrome conditions into the approach section of the FMS....pretty cool. That allows us to use them!
What plane is it? Boeing?
relax.jet is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.