Packs in Cruise
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: I know EXACTLY where I am..
Packs in Cruise
Dear Everybody!
Can you enlighten me as to your companies' SOP regarding Pack usage in cruise?
Do any of you regularly turn off packs to save fuel? Can't do it anyway on an aircraft with only two packs.. or can you?
Thanks in advance.
OORW
Can you enlighten me as to your companies' SOP regarding Pack usage in cruise?
Do any of you regularly turn off packs to save fuel? Can't do it anyway on an aircraft with only two packs.. or can you?
Thanks in advance.
OORW
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: Wingham NSW Australia
Reduced Packs
I think that quite apart from any SOP or safety consideration it would be imprudent to close down a pack as a way of reducing fuel burn rates because of the effect on the paying passenger comfort. Used to use 1/2 pack flow on the Classic at times, however this led to a stuffy environment in the aircraft due to the reduced outflow, especially on high pax density loads. Shutting down a pack is not something I would use to save fuel, much rather cruise at best level/best speed for weight in the prevailing ambient conditions. 
PPRuNe supporter
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
We change the pack flow when the loads are lite, below 100 on the A320 or 140 on the A321. We have no SOP to turn off packs in flight. I don't think that type of operation would fly where I'm at.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
On the 747 Classics that didn't have the half flow option, we used to shut down one aircon pack as normal ops in cruise (and close the heat exchanger air inlet door for that pack), and restart it just prior to descent...never a problem!
For those that are not aware, the 747 Classic had three packs and a flight engineer to operate all these fiddly bits, all very good things to have!
Flew them for years that way...
Cheers...FD...
For those that are not aware, the 747 Classic had three packs and a flight engineer to operate all these fiddly bits, all very good things to have!
Flew them for years that way...
Cheers...FD...
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
From: Gold Coast
Others may disagree, but having only two packs and shutting one down to save money borders on gross negligence.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Others may disagree, but having only two packs and shutting one down to save money borders on gross negligence.
If one air conditioning pack (on a two pack aeroplane) were to be shutdown as a fuel saving measure, and then the other pack were to fail for some reason, re-starting the shutdown pack would be required.
Meanwhile, the cabin pressurization would be greatly affected....and if the intentionally shutdown pack was to not re-start, a high dive is assured.
The fleet manager would not be amused, pilot dismissal time, I would think.
Regulatory action might well follow.
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: A little leaky boat
On my current aircraft, which only has two packs, we regularly fly with only one pack on. This is with the knowledge and approval of the local regulators.
The aircraft can also be dispatched with only one pack operative without restrictions.
The aircraft can also be dispatched with only one pack operative without restrictions.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
Hear, Hear....Old Fella!
The rules governing single pack operation are quite clear, and Breecher is a breacher of those safety-related rules!
Cheers...FD...
PS: Maybe he has removed the plug to let the water out of his little boat, saves having to bail the water!
The rules governing single pack operation are quite clear, and Breecher is a breacher of those safety-related rules!
Cheers...FD...
PS: Maybe he has removed the plug to let the water out of his little boat, saves having to bail the water!
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: OZ
Shutting down 1 pack on a 2 Pack aircraft to save fuel....
Ok on 767 A330 etc when you are in cruise with 2 packs operating. The pack out put is aroung 60%. Built in fuel saving by manufacturer.
If you lose a Pack the servicable Pack 767 defaults to 146% flow and the A330 goes to High flow (not sure of the figure but is similar). regardles of "high flow" switch position
So staright away your bleed loads are higher ... therefore higher fuel burn with 1 Pack running.
It will take a clever aerodynamicist to tell us whether the reduced drag due to 1 Packs cooling doors closed will compensate for the added fuel burn due to higher bleed loads.
Ok on 767 A330 etc when you are in cruise with 2 packs operating. The pack out put is aroung 60%. Built in fuel saving by manufacturer.
If you lose a Pack the servicable Pack 767 defaults to 146% flow and the A330 goes to High flow (not sure of the figure but is similar). regardles of "high flow" switch position
So staright away your bleed loads are higher ... therefore higher fuel burn with 1 Pack running.
It will take a clever aerodynamicist to tell us whether the reduced drag due to 1 Packs cooling doors closed will compensate for the added fuel burn due to higher bleed loads.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 48
From: Horn Island
On my current aircraft, which only has two packs, we regularly fly with only one pack on. This is with the knowledge and approval of the local regulators.
The aircraft can also be dispatched with only one pack operative without restrictions.
The aircraft can also be dispatched with only one pack operative without restrictions.
On my current aircraft, which only has two packs, we sometimes fly with only one pack on. The aircraft can be dispatched with only one pack operative with restrictions.
This is with the knowledge and approval of the local regulators.
Dash 8, BAe146, B717 + many more I am sure.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: Wingham NSW Australia
Inoperatve Pack
RENUPP, thanks for clarifying Breecher's post. We are all aware that the MEL would permit despatch with one pack inop, with restrictions. I would be amazed if the regulator would condone the practice of shutting down one pack as a fuel saving measure as a SOP. Thanks too, to Bolty McBolt for the info on how the B767 and A330 automatically reschedule mass flow in the event of a pack shutting down.
PPRuNe supporter
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
Our MEL also allows us to fly around for ten days with a brake deactivated, with restrictions, I believe the regulators did this to aid the operator in returning the aircraft back to base, not to save on wear and tear on one set of brakes. 
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: I know EXACTLY where I am..
MEL
I think we are all aware that some operators seem to see the time granted in MELs as targets, and not as an absolute maximum time granted to get something repaired. Same with Duty hours, service intervals, and, and, and..
Back to thread: what Aircraft, beside the 747 old and new have more than two Packs? I cant think of any, except older aircraft like the 707 and similar.
OORW
Back to thread: what Aircraft, beside the 747 old and new have more than two Packs? I cant think of any, except older aircraft like the 707 and similar.
OORW
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Back to thread: what Aircraft, beside the 747 old and new have more than two Packs? I cant think of any, except older aircraft like the 707 and similar.
Don't confuse potential engine bleed sources versus number of packs.
B707, two packs only, one pack dispatch OK (not long overwater) however altitude restrictions apply.
L1011, three packs installed and normally used, two pack dispatch OK, no restrictions.
why not shutting down an engine to save fuel now?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Gypsy land
On the Airbus 340/330,when 1 pack is off or when the packs are supplied by the APU bleed,the pack flow automatically goes to high which results in an increased fuel burn of upto 1.5 percent.On a long haul flight with a burnoff of 90,000kgs this is quite a substantial amount!In my opinion,the only safe and prudent way of saving fuel is 1)landing in config3 (reduced landing flap config) 2)shutting 2 engines down on the 340 or 1 engine on the 330 after landing 3)where possible,idle reversethrust.
Switching a pack off in flight increases your fuel burn substancialy,well,at least as far as airbuses are concerned!
Switching a pack off in flight increases your fuel burn substancialy,well,at least as far as airbuses are concerned!