Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A-320 question


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A-320 question

Old 4th April 2008 | 17:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: UAE
A-320 question

Dear all,

The taxi light swt has three positions OFF-TAXI-T/O. Does it mean that the T/O position (both lights On) is to be used for takeoff only and not for landing.

What are the drawbacks if the T/O position is used for landing also. IMHO making approaches into bird infested airports, I would like to have all the lights on.

Regards
sharpshooter41 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2008 | 17:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: London
I think the Airbus SOP has the light in “T/O position (both lights On)” for landing.

One drawback in this position is the light will reflect back in our eyes on approach in precipitation or cloud. Having the light in the T/O position in heavy snow can be especially disorientating.

Under these conditions you may want to select the light to the taxi position. Next time you are on approach in cloud/percip., play around and you will see the difference.
chapola is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2008 | 18:08
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: UAE
Can you tell me where can I lay my hands on the Airbus SOP?

Yes, you are right, in clouds it is better to leave the lights and not the taxi light only, Off to avoid the reflection which you have so rightly pointed out.

However, my query is about fair weather day/night scenarios.
sharpshooter41 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2008 | 19:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: London
Sorry, I guess it's my own company's SOP that has us set the nose light to T/O on approach. I don't know where you can get an Airbus SOP.

From my Airbus SOP 3.03.18, ILS Approach: Exterior lights.......set:

set: The nose switch to TAXI
chapola is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2008 | 19:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Argentina
Yep Nose - Taxi
Rwy Turn Off - ON
Land - ON

Thats what airbus sops say.
downsouth is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2008 | 21:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: UK
We have our Nose wheel Taxi light on TO for take off, and Taxi for landing.
Gillespie is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2008 | 21:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 1
From: Sunrise Senior Living
FCOM used o say about this 'to avoid unwanted reflections.' Don't know if it still does.

Cheers,
mcdhu
mcdhu is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2008 | 07:21
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: UAE
Still waiting for some experienced hand to shed further light on the issue.(pun intended)

Someone has told me that there was not enough space to write T/O LDG together and therefore T/O won.
sharpshooter41 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th April 2008 | 09:18
  #9 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
I've been told:

Taxi light is tilted downwards.
T/O light points further away.

At flare T/O light points up, and light scatter will severly imapir your visual reference.

Good SOP must not require pilot to ponder about ad-hoc applicability of individual items.

Using T/O light for landings increases filament usage both in time and cycles by 100% incurring unnecessary running costs.

During approach unlike taxi, RWY turnoff, and landing lights, the T/O lt does not provide much extra illumination of the NW strut when viewed from a point on the aircraft trajectory.

Really, what reason is there to use T/O light for approach and landing.

FD (the un-real)
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 7th April 2008 | 09:34
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine Coast
Blind pigeon

It's very important to follow the FCOM blindly, and not to use any grey matter whatsoever in the operation of your aircraft. Geez - you might even THINK!
Spaz Modic is offline  
Reply
Old 9th April 2008 | 23:04
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Question How to scare birds on take off and landing

Spaz, sorry for the thread creep, but regarding birds, some people say that the weather radar gives them the heebies ... may I ask if anyone know if there's any truth in it (reference rather than crew room gossip please)
PPRuNeUser0183 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th April 2008 | 23:40
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire
Yep, I've heard many examples of this. Seems unlikely, for most modern WX radar, field strength drops below 10 milliwatts once you get much past 10ft away from the emitter, so you can imagine what you would get at a range of hundreds of feet.

BHDH.
BigHitDH is offline  
Reply
Old 10th April 2008 | 09:56
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: france
Agree with Spaz, SOP only pilots are scary but more and more common.

Forget the book, if you need T/O light use it, if not don't. Personally I use it at night for ldg but some don't like it. Everybody's got is own sense of vision comfort, so adapt accordingly.
woodywood is offline  
Reply
Old 10th April 2008 | 14:35
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: UAE
@FlightDetent

Wish you had given some reference for the info about the light being tilted etc

@Woodywood
Agree with you. I also use the T/O position for Ldg when I am PF. Just wanted to know the opinion of more experienced hands.

Thanks for all your comments
sharpshooter41 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th April 2008 | 11:18
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in the Northern Hemisphere
T/O Light on Landing

The use of T/O light for landing is not recommended as on landing (depending on the impact) the filament has a greater probability of shattering than in Taxi position. At least that is what the engineers think.

Weather radar has no affect on bird scaring...........
Bingaling is offline  
Reply
Old 15th April 2008 | 12:16
  #16 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Binga: Especially as it is a different filament.

ssh41: FCOM 1.33.20 p2, PFD pitch attitude for approach and flare, light cones observed on other taxiing aircraft.

Most importantly one of my two Airbus factory TRE who pointed out that my previous type and SOP practice to set TO light with the issue of LDG clearance
- was dubious from Human Factors / Error management stand point
- was not in-line with manufacturer's recommandations that were well researched and based on the design of the aircraft
- bird scare input was very disputable and all other effect were only negative
- one day will make me lose vis reference at marginal conditions

Somehow, I decided to THINK and only then tell this 20000 hrs teacher how I hate SOP-only pilots. NOT.

Give it a try, at 5° pitch before touchdown it does very little to illuminate runway. The white patch of light scatter above ground is easily done without. And you more than double the longevity of the light.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 16th April 2008 | 17:05
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
@Bingaling: Do you have a reference for that please?
PPRuNeUser0183 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th April 2008 | 23:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in the Northern Hemisphere
Cheque list....don't have reference for taxi light query. The note re filament is from the engineering department.

With regard to the use of weather radar to deter birds, it is debatable whether there is any real positive effect on bird scaring, however it was mentioned in this CAA article........

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/1437/srg_a...-01-030303.pdf
Bingaling is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2008 | 07:51
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Stockholm Sweden
Wish you had given some reference for the info about the light being tilted etc
I had a tech log write up from an A320 captain recently. Both landing lights are angled downwards.
He was correct. Turning the landing lights on (the ones on the wings) they illuminate the ground beside the fwd pax doors.
So the answer ..Correct. They are meant to. They are landing lights.
Swedish Steve is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2008 | 15:30
  #20 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 2
From: Glorious West Sussex
Swedish Steve..
Turning the landing lights on (the ones on the wings)
What kind of A320 is that? The landing lights are on the fuselage....
TP
TyroPicard is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.