Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Working out the crosswind component

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Working out the crosswind component

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th April 2008 | 17:45
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
er340790, I don't mean to be pedantic, but in the interest of clarification, I assume you mean when TWR gives you the w/v, you then use your method to calculate the crosswind?
mini-jumbo is offline  
Old 10th April 2008 | 18:04
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Bournemouth
Here's one i don't think has been mentioned: i'm ready to be slated by the mathmeticians!!

For Crosswind component ..... Wind Angle + 20 in % = XWC

ie Rwy 26 Wind 300/30 (40+20) = 60% = 18kts

For Headwind Component ...... 110 - Wind Angle in %

ie Rwy 26 Wind 300/30 (110-40) = 70% = 21kts


Seems to work fairly accurately, I also like the clock method and of course the good old graph, especially when winds get a bit close to the limits!
sayagaingoaround is offline  
Old 12th April 2008 | 10:31
  #43 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Finland
On approach, are you interested in the x-wind or the wind vector which gives you the maximum allowable/demonstrated x-wind for the runway in use?

When on Budgies in the Scottish Isles (and DC10 at bermuda), I used to write a wind table, for each ten degrees, giving this wind vector. That way I knew if I was within the limit.

It was sometimes useful to tell (ask) the controller to give no further wind checks after receiving one within limits.
A wind above the demonstrated limit was acceptable if everything felt right, whereas on other occasions I have gone around when the x-wind was within limits because turbulence made the aircraft almost uncontrollable.

A particular problem with a strong x-wind at 90 (or there about) degrees to the runway can be the along runway component.

Sumburgh 09/27 (15/33 not available at night) is a case in point.

A small change in wind direction can, with a strong northerly, cause the wind to come around the other side of Fitful Head giving an unexpected and sudden tailwind on landing despite the reported wind appearing to be a headwind
There is not much tarmac left if you land (three reds and a white and little or no flare - my technique at Sumburgh at night) with an 18kt tailwind on 09 !!
Cost me several beers to the firecrew in the helicopter club that night!!
finncapt is offline  
Old 17th April 2008 | 19:30
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: UK
sayagaingoaround,

thats the method i always use....its a rough rule but works fine for me!
link_142 is offline  
Old 18th April 2008 | 23:15
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
You can find both the headwind or tailwind and the crosswind with this formula (a TI-83 calculator will do well with this):

sin(wind_direction-current_heading)*wind_speed = headwind or tailwind component

cos(wind_direction-current_heading)*wind_speed = crosswind

For headwinds and tailwinds, a negative number means a tailwind and naturally a positive number is a headwind.

For crosswinds, a negative number is from the left. A positive number means winds are from the right. Hope this helps!
flyr767 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.