Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320...Inflight Diversion Vs Landing Dist

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320...Inflight Diversion Vs Landing Dist

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Dec 2007, 12:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: kuwait
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320...Inflight Diversion Vs Landing Dist

Hello....

let's say that you are enroute...and you want to divert to enroute alternate due ...medical siuation or shortage of fuel.

your landing will be normal...i.e no failure...

assuming a landing weight of say 60.000KG....

to know the landing distance...do you use ...actual landing dist without auto brake (QRH4.03) or Required landing distance FCOM 2 ...or to look at the automatic landing dist with auto brake (as it will be almost identical to the normal pilot landing ? )

how to know the landing dist for diversion with out failure?

thanks
kuwait340 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 14:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: United States of Europe
Age: 40
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Inflight you would normally use autoland distance with autobrake QRH 4.04. Or alternatively the Landing module of FOVE using the LPC if equipped.

You can perfectly use QRH 4.03 (without autobrake. i.e. max manual braking) inflight, but I would think twice before diverting into a place where you'd need max manual braking.

So legally inflight you can land on any runway where you can make the numbers work, QRH 4.02, 4.03, 4.04 (or LPC).

Hope this answers the q.
OPEN DES is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2007, 04:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: N33 24.7 E36 30.8 E 36 30.8
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi

assuming a dry rwy with no failures and a GW of 60T at the diversion airfield...and not using the autoland feature on the machine..i would look at the required landing distance since it will give me a 40% safety margin in general

autoland/config full/dry rwy/autobrakes low/60T...2104m
actual ldg dist/no autobrakes............................810m
req ldg dist....................................................1350 m
bflyer is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2007, 07:01
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: kuwait
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks guys for the great inputs...

during our type rating course...we have been informed to use the figures of the auto land incase of inflight diversion with out any failure...

as these figures are very close to the manula landing with auto brake.

have a good day
kuwait340 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2007, 16:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: france
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with bflyer and to make it easy, on the 320 series the dry RLD ( ALD x1.67 ) equals approx. the dry autoland brake MED.
So with the 4.04 (autoland) table in MED you are basically covered and still have the choice to manual brake.
Now if you really need take the ALD but no margin in there.
woodywood is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.