Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Headwind Component

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Headwind Component

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Dec 2007, 21:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Headwind Component

I know the rules of thumb for calculating the x-wind component on T/O ie 1/6 or 1/3 or angle plus 20% but I cant figure out how to reverse it and get the headwind component. Any help!! I know they are related.
R2000/1830 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2007, 09:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
110% minus angle of wind

e.g. 30 degrees off - 80%

regards
hetfield is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2007, 12:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually R2000, they're not related. If you know the crosswind component only, you cannot figure out the headwind component. For example, if the wind is 60 degrees off the nose at 10 knots, then the crosswind component is 10*sin(60) = 8.67 knots. However, if all you know is the crosswind component, for example 8.67 knots, then this could equate to zero headwind if the actual wind is a 90 degree crosswind at 8.67 knots, or it could equate to a headwind of 5.00 knots (10*cos(60) = 5 knots) if the actual wind is 60 degrees off the nose at 10 knots. In fact, if all you know is the crosswind component, there is an infinite number of wind/angle possibilities that fit this crosswind component.

Hawk
hawk37 is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2007, 22:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A long way from here.
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R2000

This is a curious source of confusion for many pilots, including (and in my experience, in particular) some very experienced ones.

Here's how to do it:

First of all use the clock-face rule of thumb: 15 degrees = 25%, 30->50% 45->75% etc.

In the same way that one needs to consider how many degrees off the nose the wind is for x-wind component, for headwind, we need to consider the angular distance between the wind and the wingtip.

For instance, consider lining up on runway 27 somewhere or other. If the wind was 240/10, then the wind is 30 degrees (or thereabouts!) from the nose, so 10x0.5=5 kts x-wind.
The wind is 60 degrees from the wingtips, however, which are pointing N/S - 360, 180 degrees. So in this case, the clock-face r.o.t tells us consider all of the wind as h-wind = 10kts. As pilotmike correctly points out, the real number is closer to 90%, but never mind!

Another example, still on rwy 27:
Wind 340/20
X-wind 20 kts (70 degrees from nose, so 1 x 20=20)
H-Wind 6-7 kts (20 degrees from wingtip, so 1/3 x 20 = 6 and a bit)

You'll also notice that in the above example 70+20=90, and in the first one 60+30=90. No big surprise for those who have a recollection of trigonometry!

In my experience it works, more quickly and accurately than the captains calculator. That he's forgotten how to use.

sin/cos on your calculator, are, of course, fine if you have one handy, and the time to use it.

Hope this helps
CC
Chuffer Chadley is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 06:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Chuffer

I'm afraid we both missed the point.

R2000 wants to figure out the headwind component based on the x-wind component, which in fact is not possible as explained by hawk37.

regards
hetfield is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 06:47
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dubai
Age: 56
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Making all this WAY to difficult!!

Remember for the performace graphs the wind is factored already. HEADWIND component is factored 50% and the TAILWIND component is factored 150%.

So within 45 deg of the nose use ALL, more than 45 deg, use 1/2.
Avi8tor is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 06:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When are we going to be given only the x-wind component? We get given a wind velocity from which we can workm out both head and x-wind. Unless it is for theoretical purposes, there is no need to work backwards.
A Very Civil Pilot is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 16:12
  #8 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In some States, perhaps specifically for mil operations, I understand that ATC passes the X-wind component (although I always thought that it was in addition to passing the wind velocity).
 
Old 9th Nov 2012, 18:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: South of equator
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

When you're in the sim and the pressure is on and the workload high you wont even be able to spell sin or cos, get the simplest method possible

Last edited by Not Nightowl; 9th Nov 2012 at 18:23.
Not Nightowl is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2012, 18:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 12 o'clock opposite direction
Age: 34
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think sin/cos is the simplest, the calculator has to do the job.

sin of (wind direction - runway heading) x wind speed for crosswind

cos of (wind direction - runway heading) x wind speed for head/tail wind


Runway 32 wind from 280 at 15kts

crosswind 9,64kts

headwind 11,5kts


Last edited by AirGek; 9th Nov 2012 at 18:22.
AirGek is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2012, 18:35
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reduce the whole thing to remembering three numbers: 0.5, 0.7 & 0.9. These numbers can be used as the sines/co-sines, as appropriate, for 30, 45 and 60 degrees. Use them as appropriate. They are accurate enough for government work.

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2012, 19:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2012, 21:49
  #13 (permalink)  
Green Guard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
please advise how can I insert here a page from Mcsft Office Word ...
 
Old 10th Nov 2012, 05:38
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
If you are taking off to the north ( 000) and the wind is 030/10 then I assume you know that 30 degrees is 0.5 and therefore you have 5kts crosswind.
If the wind was the same but you were departing off 09 I bet you could work out the crosswind too, 60 degrees off therefore 80% = 8kts.
The crosswind in the second example is the headwind in the first example. So all you need to do is subtract the 30 from 90 and then apply the sin rule of thumb you have and you have your headwind.
All you need to learn is the basic sin rules.
30=0.5
40=0.6
50=0.7
60=0.8

Another example to show you;

Departing to the north.
Wind 050/10
Crosswind = 10x0.7 = 7kts
Headwind = (90-50) = 40 now apply the sin rule of thumb to get 0.6
= 0.6x 10 = 6kts.
Simple the only thing you need to know is the four sin rules and the fact that you have to subtract the "degrees off" from 90 if it is a headwind you are after.
framer is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 06:00
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Western Pacific
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly, Capt Fathom! I still carry one in my pocket.

And for the modern pilot, there are a number of iPhone/iPad apps that do the job well, including the E6B calculator. Pilot Wizz is a free one that is quite handy for most things aeronautical.

Beats all that strenuous mental calculating.
Oakape is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 07:18
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,552
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Piltdown Man
Reduce the whole thing to remembering three numbers: 0.5, 0.7 & 0.9. These numbers can be used as the sines/co-sines, as appropriate, for 30, 45 and 60 degrees. Use them as appropriate. They are accurate enough for government work.
Works a treat (for contract work as well!).

Framer, Hefield, 60° is 0.9, not 0.8.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 07:44
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
Yeah it's not exactly right but the important thing is that it's simple and quick and very close to being right. If the situation is that critical that you need to use the exact sin of sixty (0.866) , then a mental rule of thumb is not the best method anyway. An FX-82c might be more appropriate.
framer is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 08:48
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you think that the crosswind is going to be a factor then before your approach work out the maximum you can accept for each wind direction. e.g.

Runway 27 (magnetic heading 270 degrees)
Max crosswind allowed 25 knots

Wind 220 degrees, max strength 32 knots
Wind 210 degrees, max strength 28 knots
Wind 200 degrees, max strength 26 knots
Wind 190 degrees, max strength 25 knots
etc...

It'll only take 5 mins to do as part of your approach preparation and it means you won't be caught out when tower gives you that final wind check passing 200ft. It's not the time to be doing maths!
EGPFlyer is online now  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 09:02
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
I've never thought of doing that but it's a good idea. Will try it this week. Ta.
framer is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2012, 09:08
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,552
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
It'll only take 5 mins to do as part of your approach preparation
I hope it takes less than that!
Capn Bloggs is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.