Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Exceeding Floor Loading Restrictions.


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Exceeding Floor Loading Restrictions.

Old 2nd December 2007 | 09:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
From: Springfield
Exceeding Floor Loading Restrictions.

I would like people input re damage done, of busting floor loading in aircraft.

Does anyone know of any reports of such incidents?

Eg, like floor loading maybe like 100kg per square foot.

Thanks in advance.
Ejector is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd December 2007 | 11:54
  #2 (permalink)  
CR2

Top Dog
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Close to FACT
Would need to know what type of a/c you are talking about. 100kg/sq.ft would not be a problem on a 744F.

Exceeding floor limits tends to be not good for the floor beams.
CR2 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd December 2007 | 13:07
  #3 (permalink)  
ft
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: N. Europe
Chances are nothing serious will happen... at first. The aircraft is built to withstand a certain load factor at the maximum floor loading.

Then you have a hard landing or hit severe turbulence, getting close to the limiting load factor... and the floor collapses. Floorboards or seat tracks/seat track support structure fail and you end up with aircraft structure, cargo and underfloor aircraft systems entangled in one another.

The last item would be the main concern. You may find hydraulic lines, environment system ducting, packs, avionics, fuel lines and control cables there, none of which are likely to react well to having floor beams crash down upon them.

In short - don't.

The result I've actually seen is cracked floorboards, with no further consequences. Not due to flying with floor load limits outside of tolerances, but due to exceeding them while loading. Expensive.

On a sidenote, try calculating the floor loading under the heels of a pair of high-heeled shoes... ouch! Then try telling a 50 kg woman that you have to place spreaders in the aisle before allowing her to board... double ouch!
ft is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2007 | 01:33
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
From: Springfield
The twin otter has flor loading on many of the 100-200 (two long rails) of only 100lbs per square foot.

The 300's (three long rails) has 200lbs per square foot.

Not much when taking minning stuff.
Ejector is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2007 | 05:07
  #5 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,447
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
Not much when taking mining stuff

.. which is what shoring boards are for ...
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.