Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

What Is The Max Tail Wind Limit For CFM 56-5B at Start Up ?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

What Is The Max Tail Wind Limit For CFM 56-5B at Start Up ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 20:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: kuwait
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What Is The Max Tail Wind Limit For CFM 56-5B at Start Up ?

Hello....

i fly the A320 powered by CFM 56-5B high bypass ration turbo fan engines.

any idea what is the max tail wind it can take during engine start ?

thanks
kuwait340 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 05:29
  #2 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The BR715 as fitted to the Douglas Boeing 717 requires reversers to be deployed if starting with a tailwind component in excess of 25kt.

Doesn't the Bus FCOM give the limit?
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 05:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dream land
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had the same question about my aircraft type and the manufacturer said if it is not in the manual there is no limit, got to add that was aircraft and not engine manufacturer, it's a Rolls Royce engine.
EMB170 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 11:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AEP
Age: 80
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Starting with tailwind on hi-bypass engines...

Hola Kuwait340 -
xxx
Sorry, I dont have anything specific about the CFM-56, and no experience in the A-320... I flew the DC8-70s with 4 CFM-56s long ago in the "last century", do not recall of a specific limit of tailwinds, but yes - I recall that we were supposed to be more careful starting with tailwinds than with the "regular" engines... There were no limitations in the AFM...
xxx
I can however pass along some recommendations which I apply presently with the engines I operate, the JT9D-7Qs for the 747-200s. You can probably "translate" the recommendations and "convert" the info to some applicable numbers for your CFMs...
xxx
Yes, in the classroom or the briefings, we insist on avoiding strong tailwinds for start, but in some cases, it is not avoidable -
xxx
Try to "motor" the engine at the highest possible N2, but with more concern for the N1 you need to have - Normally, we need at least 20% N2 to move the fuel "ON", but if N2 is INOP, our N1 minimum is 4%... With a tailwind we insist on having N1 at a minimum of 5%, and I am more concerned of N1 minimum than N2... Keep a sharp eye on EGT rise (potential of hot starts) and monitor the N1 spooling-up to be normal (again, less concern with N2).
xxx
Fact is - do not combine potential problems (APU with unsufficient airbleed start pressure with tailwinds) or ground airstart units which lack "vitamins" with a strong tailwind. Consider also amending which engine you start first, in case your airline SOP is to start the nş 2 engine first, with a tailwind coming from 4 or 5 o´clock relative to the airplane, I would start the engine closer to the fuselage, on the opposite side, possibly, the tailwind there will be reduced.
xxx
This are the only recommendations I can give you -

Happy contrails
BelArgUSA is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 12:29
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: kuwait
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hello...

our FCOM doesn't mention any limitation on the max tailwind to start the engine.

BelArgUSA
thank you very much for your great explanation...you are always a great help.

thanx guys
kuwait340 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 12:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus and most probably also Boeing don't give a value for tail wind for its CFM fitted aircraft.

The reason is simply that it depends not only on the wind, but also on other parameters, I can imagine the state of the engine, the temperatures aso.

So AI recommends to do a manual start whenever you have tailwind, knowing that most of the time people wont do it
But they are covered if something happens. CFM and IAE engines have proven to be very stable even with strong tailwind conditions during startup.

hth,
Dani
Dani is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 13:24
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: kuwait
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello Dani...

in my opinion the Auto start or Manual start are not very different on the airbus A320 fitted with the CFM 56...because :

in the Auto start the LP fuel valve will open at 22% N2 (Very close to the Max motoring Value)

and in the Manual start the recommendation is to set the LP fuel valve (engine master switch) when the N2 Reaches more than 20% or reaches the Max motoring value.

and i have noticed the max motoring value is almost 24-25% N2.

Good Day.
kuwait340 is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2007, 02:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NZWN New Zealand
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shoot at Wellington they pushback into 80 knot winds and still do engine starts.
Kiwiguy is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2007, 02:28
  #9 (permalink)  
PPRuNe supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kuwait, never had a problem starting due to tail winds over a ten year period, the book will give you the conditions when Manual start should be considered, this is one of them.
Dream Land is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.