Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A346 - cargo limitations ?


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A346 - cargo limitations ?

Old 9th November 2007 | 12:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Trindade
Question A346 - cargo limitations ?

I am not sure whether this should be on the rumour section, because that is the information as I heard it; a rumour.

Apparently the Airbus A340-600 cannot upload the promised cargo because of fuselage flexing. Hence to some airlines it has been a disappointment ?

When the A346 first came out, the sales line was; Fill her up with cargo and the passengers are a bonus. Yet it appears that the A346 cannot be filled with cargo because of the said problem.

I like flying in the aircraft, I generally have a preference for Airbus over Boeing, but that is just a personal preference;not a technical one.

When I first flew in a A340-500, which presumably does not have the flexing proplem; I found the aircraft, smooth, quiet and stable. My favourite to fly in.

Is this cargo problem for the Airbus A346 a story or fact ?

Perhaps that is why Boeing has sold 1,000 B777's ?
Hermano Lobo is offline  
Reply
Old 10th November 2007 | 09:23
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 3
From: London
Not sure about fuselage flex, but the -600 certainly does have a few issues regarding CG limits. All those heavy first class cabins at the front have implications for the cargo boys when it comes to where they can put the non-SLF.
BleedingOn is offline  
Reply
Old 10th November 2007 | 09:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: UK
Have a look at the sales of 777 and 340, say no more!!!
Joetom is offline  
Reply
Old 11th November 2007 | 20:45
  #4 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,447
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
I have no specific information re the particular Airbus. However, do be aware that most larger aircraft have fuselage bending limitations built into the weight control manuals etc. I would expect nothing different with Airbus.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply
Old 11th November 2007 | 23:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: House
i heard the 340-200/300 are already been lined up for conversions, I thought the 340- 500/600 was a beefed up version with biiger donks?
Agent Mulder is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.