Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

ATR above FL 250

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

ATR above FL 250

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Oct 2007, 13:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: BELGIUM
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATR above FL 250

Hello,

Can somebody explain me why the ceiling of an ATR is artificially limited to FL250?

I know FL 250 being the service ceiling due to the pax drop down O2 mask and maybe it could be a limitation due to max differential pressure.

I ve heared stories of ATRs being ferried above FL250. Did they have special approval?

Dirk
DIRRIK is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2007, 14:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They only carried limited O2 for pax supply under JAR-OPS - that's why it's artificially limited. If they went higher they'd have to carry O2 for each seat, below 250 they don't have to.

I know of ferry flights where they've managed to step-climb it to nearer 300, that said, you'll be lucky to get it above that. In the summer we used to struggle getting it above 190!!!
5150 is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2007, 14:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There seems to be a general lack of appreciation by some younger pilots about the performance of turbine powered aircraft at higher altitudes.
Perhaps it is thought by some that 'higher is always better' when in actual fact, in many cases, this certainly is not the case.
One might read the accident report of the very stupid performance of the relatively inexperienced pilots of a CRJ operated by Pinnacle Airlines a couple of years ago....could be a rather large wake-up call for younger hot-shot pilots...
411A is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2007, 14:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: United States of Europe
Age: 40
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@411A

You must be joking.
Were you born aged 50 with 18000 hours in your logbook?
OPEN DES is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2007, 15:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Middle England
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The important thing is to reach 50 with 18000 hours in your logbook.
763 jock is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2007, 15:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Antigua, W.I.
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have to agree with 411A. Don't know about the ATR, but the Dash 8 (100/300) are limited to FL250, with the AFM allowing FL260 on ferry flights only. If the AFM states FL250 with pax, why would you want to go above that? If you feel that the limits shown in the AFM can be exceeded at your discretion, you have a problem.
Gooneyone is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2007, 15:32
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: BELGIUM
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
411A and Gooneyone,

You are making assumptions.

I never said that flying higher is always better neither did i say that i feel that limits in the AFM can be exceeded at my own discretion.

I just want to know why the atr is artificially limited at FL250. Is it O2, is it max differential pressure, is it something else?

Grtz
D
DIRRIK is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2007, 16:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the flight deck of course !!
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it s due to differential pressure indeed.
As far as I remember, we can select 30 000 ft maximum on the AFCS ...
ICING AOA is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2007, 16:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its designed for FL250 under normal ops as costs/certification costs increase, all the usual cost driven limits most modern props are 250, the 260 is new to me but its 8 yars since i flew the lovely machine( its a great stepping stone to and airbus, i loved it)

regards

Keepitlit
keepitlit is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2007, 16:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: europe
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been told its because the DC generators do not get enough cooling above FL 250.

Is there anybody who can confirm this?

thanks.
vipatr is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2007, 20:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: inside of a pretty bustard
Age: 53
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATR-42 is limited to FL 250 due to O2 reasons.They are 12 O2 masks in the cabin ,so one mask for 4 pax...
airman13 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.