ATR above FL 250
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: BELGIUM
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ATR above FL 250
Hello,
Can somebody explain me why the ceiling of an ATR is artificially limited to FL250?
I know FL 250 being the service ceiling due to the pax drop down O2 mask and maybe it could be a limitation due to max differential pressure.
I ve heared stories of ATRs being ferried above FL250. Did they have special approval?
Dirk
Can somebody explain me why the ceiling of an ATR is artificially limited to FL250?
I know FL 250 being the service ceiling due to the pax drop down O2 mask and maybe it could be a limitation due to max differential pressure.
I ve heared stories of ATRs being ferried above FL250. Did they have special approval?
Dirk
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They only carried limited O2 for pax supply under JAR-OPS - that's why it's artificially limited. If they went higher they'd have to carry O2 for each seat, below 250 they don't have to.
I know of ferry flights where they've managed to step-climb it to nearer 300, that said, you'll be lucky to get it above that. In the summer we used to struggle getting it above 190!!!
I know of ferry flights where they've managed to step-climb it to nearer 300, that said, you'll be lucky to get it above that. In the summer we used to struggle getting it above 190!!!
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There seems to be a general lack of appreciation by some younger pilots about the performance of turbine powered aircraft at higher altitudes.
Perhaps it is thought by some that 'higher is always better' when in actual fact, in many cases, this certainly is not the case.
One might read the accident report of the very stupid performance of the relatively inexperienced pilots of a CRJ operated by Pinnacle Airlines a couple of years ago....could be a rather large wake-up call for younger hot-shot pilots...
Perhaps it is thought by some that 'higher is always better' when in actual fact, in many cases, this certainly is not the case.
One might read the accident report of the very stupid performance of the relatively inexperienced pilots of a CRJ operated by Pinnacle Airlines a couple of years ago....could be a rather large wake-up call for younger hot-shot pilots...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Antigua, W.I.
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have to agree with 411A. Don't know about the ATR, but the Dash 8 (100/300) are limited to FL250, with the AFM allowing FL260 on ferry flights only. If the AFM states FL250 with pax, why would you want to go above that? If you feel that the limits shown in the AFM can be exceeded at your discretion, you have a problem.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: BELGIUM
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
411A and Gooneyone,
You are making assumptions.
I never said that flying higher is always better neither did i say that i feel that limits in the AFM can be exceeded at my own discretion.
I just want to know why the atr is artificially limited at FL250. Is it O2, is it max differential pressure, is it something else?
Grtz
D
You are making assumptions.
I never said that flying higher is always better neither did i say that i feel that limits in the AFM can be exceeded at my own discretion.
I just want to know why the atr is artificially limited at FL250. Is it O2, is it max differential pressure, is it something else?
Grtz
D
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its designed for FL250 under normal ops as costs/certification costs increase, all the usual cost driven limits most modern props are 250, the 260 is new to me but its 8 yars since i flew the lovely machine( its a great stepping stone to and airbus, i loved it)
regards
Keepitlit
regards
Keepitlit