Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Anyone one know if this is for real?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Anyone one know if this is for real?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Oct 2007, 21:15
  #21 (permalink)  
Buttonpusher
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bloody Hell
Age: 65
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I didn't see any control surfaces flapping around while the Airbus was gyrating, and no compression on the struts either. Just my 2c worth..
FLCH is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2007, 22:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...... B727 nose wheel braking

That's why I said modern aircraft

...... Concorde et others

They are nose wheel snubbers, operational only after take off on nose wheel retraction to stop the wheels spinning too fast in the wheel well, so totally irrelevant here.

.... smoke from sudden nose wheel ground conact .....

With all wheels on the ground in this video, you later on see a violent nose down pitch associated with smoke from the tyres. To me this would indicate nose wheel braking, which the A320 family does not have.

Clyde Basher, if you can't see the wood for the trees, then I am sorry, I can do no more.

To all SLF out there, I apologise to you on behalf of all the other professional pilots, there are always one or two who will swear black is white.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2007, 07:29
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: At the pointy end, of course
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Care to point out where I said this was for real?


I asked if anyone knew if it was.


Learn to read.

Oh yes, and any Parthian shots you care to toss in my direction will be cheerfully unread.

CC



CC
Clyde Crashcup is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2007, 07:48
  #24 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fight!

Strewth, some people will believe anything is possible. Even well produced, fairly realistic hoaxes, but not ultimately believable.

So please can we lay this garbage to rest, or better still, exterminate it altogether?
Rainboe is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2007, 08:30
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: BCN
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hard landing?

Just found this really hard landing...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOxCQZeAP3M
auch!
mighluss is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2007, 09:21
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,101
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
I asked if anyone knew if it was.
Which means you didn't know. Which means you are pretty gullible (come on just look at that thing, it has none of the inertia you'd associate with a large aircraft bouncing.)
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2007, 10:03
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sunny Sussex
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was an advert for Heineken. The 'pilot' apologises for the hard landing then wishes the austrian football team lots of luck against the dutch football team. All said in a thick dutch accent.
Is everybody happy now?
Parapunter is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2007, 01:31
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: US/EU
Age: 71
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Concorde had nosewheel braking!
Fine, A320 family never had
Phil Hudson is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2007, 03:12
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Phil

A320 family - agreed - as in my post a few before yours

Concordes braking was on retraction to stop rotation, not for runway performance - again as I said before
TopBunk is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2007, 04:41
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hades.
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
or this one.................

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhUO4...elated&search=
helen-damnation is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2007, 12:40
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: US/EU
Age: 71
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Phil

A320 family - agreed - as in my post a few before yours

Concordes braking was on retraction to stop rotation, not for runway performance - again as I said before
Sorry TP, i didn't read the post that i responded to good enaugh.
Phil Hudson is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2007, 19:45
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LGW
Age: 39
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Concorde had a nosewheel disc brake though, not a snubber...

Concorde also had a system whereby you couldn't apply the brakes until the nosewheel had spun up, even if you touched down with full pressure on the footbrakes.

Shame Airbus didn't think of that.... (referring to the thread about A320 landing with park brake on...)

On second thought I don't have the technical knowledge to get into a discussion like this. I'll just put it on the table and run...

sound of footsteps fading into distance...
aw8565 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.