Pax oxygen
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Geneva
Age: 48
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there's something in jar ops that say's the first half hour of a flight below 25000' can be made without pax oxygen. because you can be at 10000' before they start being really hypoxic. so i think the right decsion would be to at least descend to fl 250 and prepare a diversion if you've still got a long flight ahead.
i won't be able to find the reference though
seb
i won't be able to find the reference though
seb
Re No Passenger Oxygen:
I guessing the regulations of most countries would allow you to continue flight if you descend to FL250 or below.
However the difficulties of continuing a flight at that level (like distance to destination, fuel remaining, safety heights, airspace restrictions etc.) may necessitate a landing nearby and some replanning.
I guessing the regulations of most countries would allow you to continue flight if you descend to FL250 or below.
However the difficulties of continuing a flight at that level (like distance to destination, fuel remaining, safety heights, airspace restrictions etc.) may necessitate a landing nearby and some replanning.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: right here
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pax Oxy dropping to Zero.... can't happen
pax oxy comes from a chemical reaction in those containers. there is no pax oxygen-pressure that could drop to zero because this is a totally different system. there is no oxygen-container. and no gauge. and no oxygen until someone pulls a mask. a string attached pulls/triggers an igniter pin which then burns some king of candle. in this reaction oxygen is set free. no kidding.
see: i read it on wiki, it must be true
crew oxy: classic system with a bottle containing oxy and YES! a gauge that theoretically could drop to zero. gotta be a reeeally nerdy TRE to make up that scenario of crew-oxy SUDDENLY dropping to zero in the middle of a flight. and without crew-oxy u gotta descend. maybe u can spend 30min in FL120, then it's down to FL100.
see: i read it on wiki, it must be true
crew oxy: classic system with a bottle containing oxy and YES! a gauge that theoretically could drop to zero. gotta be a reeeally nerdy TRE to make up that scenario of crew-oxy SUDDENLY dropping to zero in the middle of a flight. and without crew-oxy u gotta descend. maybe u can spend 30min in FL120, then it's down to FL100.
Last edited by FCS Explorer; 28th Jun 2007 at 10:00. Reason: spelling
It is in JAR-OPS 1.770.
Edit: FCS Explorer, for a large percentage of commercial aeroplanes your statement is correct, but many types in use have a central oxygen system installed which is fed from cylinders of liquid oxygen. So Wiki is not always correct (or complete I should say)!
Edit: FCS Explorer, for a large percentage of commercial aeroplanes your statement is correct, but many types in use have a central oxygen system installed which is fed from cylinders of liquid oxygen. So Wiki is not always correct (or complete I should say)!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: right here
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, from "passenger oxygen" i assumed we are talking about today's commercial airliners, preferably western built As&Bs.
yet i wouldn't be surprised if some russian types had an oxy system with tanks and pipes all over the plane.
yet i wouldn't be surprised if some russian types had an oxy system with tanks and pipes all over the plane.
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't assume all types have individual seat row O2 cannisters. Several have plumbed in oxygen systems for pax O2 (all 747s for a start). If indications fell to zero, I would think descent to FL250 would be advisable, but if it was crew O2, why not test it over a long period by one person breathing O2 and seeing how it supplied demand? Periodic test selections supplies prerssure O2? It may be the gauge.
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If there is no AFM/QRH procedure then have a look in the MEL/DDPM. Probably talks about not above FL250 and ensure portable oxy for 10% of pax. So down to FL250 and look at your fuel would be my thoughts.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: S51 30 W060 10.
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the 737 jurassic has O2 bottles for the passengers, the classics changed that to chemical oxygen generators.
If I saw the pax o2 gauge indicating 0 I would probably descend to FL250 or 240 after confirming that indication is real (if I can).
If I saw the CREW oxy pressure indicating 0 I would try by all means to confirm validity of that indication, for example by checking any CBs and putting the masks on and breathing for a while. if I can breathe I ´d probably descend a few thousand feet just in case and keep going....if I can´t breathe or I got reasons to suspect the indication is real I´d probably try to terminate the flight asap, that means Vmo -5 kt to destination (wx and fuel permitting) or a diversion/turnback. This is because crew O2 is not only a need during a depressurization but also during a smoke situation, so if I got no O2 that ´d be a bad day.
THE 737-500 MEL says the CREW O2 pressure indicator may be inop as long as o2 bottle pressure is checked and above min requirements prior to every takeoff so if a diversion or turnback is made the flight can be continued after applying the appropriate dispatch deviation procedure.
One more thing. I believe the instrument uses DC power, just by looking at what it does when you remove power, so if it´s reading 0, it could have failed. I´d probably reset the CB once or twice too.
REgards,
SW.
If I saw the pax o2 gauge indicating 0 I would probably descend to FL250 or 240 after confirming that indication is real (if I can).
If I saw the CREW oxy pressure indicating 0 I would try by all means to confirm validity of that indication, for example by checking any CBs and putting the masks on and breathing for a while. if I can breathe I ´d probably descend a few thousand feet just in case and keep going....if I can´t breathe or I got reasons to suspect the indication is real I´d probably try to terminate the flight asap, that means Vmo -5 kt to destination (wx and fuel permitting) or a diversion/turnback. This is because crew O2 is not only a need during a depressurization but also during a smoke situation, so if I got no O2 that ´d be a bad day.
THE 737-500 MEL says the CREW O2 pressure indicator may be inop as long as o2 bottle pressure is checked and above min requirements prior to every takeoff so if a diversion or turnback is made the flight can be continued after applying the appropriate dispatch deviation procedure.
One more thing. I believe the instrument uses DC power, just by looking at what it does when you remove power, so if it´s reading 0, it could have failed. I´d probably reset the CB once or twice too.
REgards,
SW.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let me try to add some commen sense to this discussion:
1. The air (oxygen) the passengers breath on all current airliners comes for outside the aircraft. It enters the passenger cabin through the engines as bleed air. From the engines goes through a series of coolers and heaters that provides the passengers with breathing air, heating air, air conditioning and cabin pressurization. Even if all the engines fail, as long as the engines turning, you will still have air to breath and pressurization, even though the heat and air condition systems may be lost. So there is no way for the passengers to run out of oxygen.
2. There is a second source of air (oxygen) which is only used in emergancy, like when there is rapid decompression or a failure in the bleed air system and the cabin pressure can not be controled. There are two types of these systems. The hard plumbed system, were oxygen lines are ran from central tanks to individual masks for the passengers and crew. Or chemical oxygen gererators which are provided for each passenger seat, in the lavs and for the cabin crew.
1. The air (oxygen) the passengers breath on all current airliners comes for outside the aircraft. It enters the passenger cabin through the engines as bleed air. From the engines goes through a series of coolers and heaters that provides the passengers with breathing air, heating air, air conditioning and cabin pressurization. Even if all the engines fail, as long as the engines turning, you will still have air to breath and pressurization, even though the heat and air condition systems may be lost. So there is no way for the passengers to run out of oxygen.
2. There is a second source of air (oxygen) which is only used in emergancy, like when there is rapid decompression or a failure in the bleed air system and the cabin pressure can not be controled. There are two types of these systems. The hard plumbed system, were oxygen lines are ran from central tanks to individual masks for the passengers and crew. Or chemical oxygen gererators which are provided for each passenger seat, in the lavs and for the cabin crew.
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You call that common sense? What's the rest of the discussion been?
Should you have an explosive decompression, even with all engines (and packs) pumping out maximum air supply, you only have a very limited time of consciousness. Therefore you need to rapidly resort to emergency oxygen supplies which comes from your emergency system.....and the gauge is reading zero. Whaddya gonna do? That is what the discussion was about.
Thank you for your 'common sense' and explaining the technicalities, but you are way behind and haven't answered the question!
Should you have an explosive decompression, even with all engines (and packs) pumping out maximum air supply, you only have a very limited time of consciousness. Therefore you need to rapidly resort to emergency oxygen supplies which comes from your emergency system.....and the gauge is reading zero. Whaddya gonna do? That is what the discussion was about.
Thank you for your 'common sense' and explaining the technicalities, but you are way behind and haven't answered the question!