Flying Fbw Aircrafts And Conventional Acfts
Thread Starter

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: N33 24.7 E36 30.8 E 36 30.8
Flying Fbw Aircrafts And Conventional Acfts
HI GENTS
I would like your thoughts on the simultaneous flying of an FBW acft e.g B737NG/A320 and a conventional type, e.g B727..etc
What are the pros and cons and if there is any regulations governing this subject
thanks for the inputs
I would like your thoughts on the simultaneous flying of an FBW acft e.g B737NG/A320 and a conventional type, e.g B727..etc
What are the pros and cons and if there is any regulations governing this subject
thanks for the inputs
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 2
From: Europe
It doesn't make sense to categorize the handling of aircrafts with regards to FBW/not FBW, as FBW is implemented differently (B777 vs. the Airbuses). The B737NG is not FBW. Also, pilots seldom fly two jets at the same time, and if they did differences in handling would be a lesser issue.
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Latin America
The problem with the question is that it doesn't reflect the level of understanding that should be inherent with your current job as described in your profile. I can't help but think that it is a language issue and we haven't entirely understood what you are getting at and if that is the case, I apologise and I hope we can help you with the revised question.
Kindest Regards
D'vay
Kindest Regards
D'vay
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Ormond Beach
Originally Posted by D'Vay
The problem with the question is that it doesn't reflect the level of understanding that should be inherent with your current job as described in your profile.
Thread Starter

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: N33 24.7 E36 30.8 E 36 30.8
Ok.guys....thanks for all your inputs..but let me clarify the situation
the pilot-in-question is currently rated on and flies the B722..was formerly rated on and flew the A322..but due to a transient shortage of qualified pilots,the airline is exploring the feasibility of transitioning said pilot to A322(pilot shortage)..then keep his B722 rating current(recurrent training every six months)..then having said pilot rostered to fly,say one month on the A322 then the next on the B722...my question is...is there any regulatory directives issued by the FAA,CAA..etc governing this eventuality..
It is the brainstorm of a very important company beancounter as a way out of a current shortage of pilots
and yes TYPO PICARD..i too am worried about the word simultaneous.
FLYBOY LIKE i can't even manage to land a cessna 172 in the flight simulator without crashing it..my daughter beats me in this particular game
the pilot-in-question is currently rated on and flies the B722..was formerly rated on and flew the A322..but due to a transient shortage of qualified pilots,the airline is exploring the feasibility of transitioning said pilot to A322(pilot shortage)..then keep his B722 rating current(recurrent training every six months)..then having said pilot rostered to fly,say one month on the A322 then the next on the B722...my question is...is there any regulatory directives issued by the FAA,CAA..etc governing this eventuality..
It is the brainstorm of a very important company beancounter as a way out of a current shortage of pilots
and yes TYPO PICARD..i too am worried about the word simultaneous.
FLYBOY LIKE i can't even manage to land a cessna 172 in the flight simulator without crashing it..my daughter beats me in this particular game
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Latin America
See, with a litle explanation it all makes sense. If it is an accountants idea, you can bet your bottom dollar that it is not safe, oh, also let this accountant know that he is probably not as important as he thinks he is too!
D'vay
D'vay





