727 vomit comet - how do you fly it?
Thread Starter
727 vomit comet - how do you fly it?
Stephen Hawking's recent jolly got me thinking - yes, we all know that it flies a parabolic hump but how does one do that? It is probably easy enough to say "pressure on bum - stick forward; pressure off bum, stick back" but I assume this is not accurate enough to prevent the floating pax being bumped around against the cabin floor & roof. Could one perhaps tape a pingpong ball on a string to the overhead console & work the stick to keep the ball floating?(!!!) Also what about the pull out? - it must get to some rather severe attitudes and gees at the end of the ride - I guess they had poor old Hawking well protected during that phase of the ride?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: north
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.astronomicaltours.net/ZeroG/airplane.htm
The major modification enabling the Boeing 727 to conduct Weightless Flight involves an upgrade to the aircraft’s hydraulic system. The modification allows for continuous hydraulic pressure during the performance of parabolas. The modification, along with the addition of accelerometers in the cockpit, were tested and approved by the FAA under a Supplemental Type Certificate (STC).
M
The major modification enabling the Boeing 727 to conduct Weightless Flight involves an upgrade to the aircraft’s hydraulic system. The modification allows for continuous hydraulic pressure during the performance of parabolas. The modification, along with the addition of accelerometers in the cockpit, were tested and approved by the FAA under a Supplemental Type Certificate (STC).
M
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My questions are more along the maintenance line:
Since the structural load cycles between 0.0 and 1.8G several times per flight, is each parabola counted as a flight cycle?
Does engine oil pressure drop due to pump cavitation, and are the bearings tolerant of brief loss of cooling flow of oil; or is there a positive feed mod?
Since the structural load cycles between 0.0 and 1.8G several times per flight, is each parabola counted as a flight cycle?
Does engine oil pressure drop due to pump cavitation, and are the bearings tolerant of brief loss of cooling flow of oil; or is there a positive feed mod?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: N33 24.7 E36 30.8 E 36 30.8
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HI
i've been flying the 727 for almost three years now and every minute of it was pure joy.......well almost all.
The old girl doing parabolas with astronauts aboard..amazing what a good platform will do
i've been flying the 727 for almost three years now and every minute of it was pure joy.......well almost all.
The old girl doing parabolas with astronauts aboard..amazing what a good platform will do
I used to enjoy doing Zero G arcs in Aerobatic aircraft.
I always found the hard part wasn't maintaining zero G vertically, but laterally. Zeor G=Zero induced drag, so the aircraft has a tendency to accelerate.
I'd be interested to know what thrust setting they need to maintain a zero acceleration during the arcs in the 727.
I always found the hard part wasn't maintaining zero G vertically, but laterally. Zeor G=Zero induced drag, so the aircraft has a tendency to accelerate.
I'd be interested to know what thrust setting they need to maintain a zero acceleration during the arcs in the 727.
I suspect the engines would be at constant power to save fiddling, but you will get linear acceleration +- all through the maneuver.
The downline builds airspeed while the pullup and upline dissipate it.
Likely not that much linear accel during the 0G segment.
Now for a bit of entertainment -- what is the 0G stall speed?
The downline builds airspeed while the pullup and upline dissipate it.
Likely not that much linear accel during the 0G segment.
Now for a bit of entertainment -- what is the 0G stall speed?
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Up North UK
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My immediate unthinking response is that there isn't one, because the wing is not generating lift it cannot suffer the loss of lift at stall. ? ? ?
Standing by to be shot down.
Standing by to be shot down.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Correct - an aircraft wing cannot stall in a 0g manouevre like that. A well-known 'get-out-of-jail' ticket for those who have overcooked it a bit in combat.
. It gives you time for the thrust to increase your speed a bit.
However, in the 1.8 g pull-out...............................
. It gives you time for the thrust to increase your speed a bit.However, in the 1.8 g pull-out...............................
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd be interested to know what thrust setting they need to maintain a zero acceleration during the arcs in the 727.
Given that as altitude increases, speed bleeds off, then thrust must decrease too as does drag. Similarly, after rounding over the top, as airspeed increases, so must thrust.
But lower air density over the top means that thrust is dropping without any throttle movement. Whether the density falloff coincides with the speed/drag/thrust requirement I'm not sure, but as a first approximation I'd say little throttle motion is needed.
Further enlightenment welcome!
