Ground Speed Mini and Strong Headwinds
Union Goon
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MAX,
I think we are closer than you think in our approaches to the aircraft.
I will NEVER select a speed lower than ground speed mini with the autothottles engaged near the ground. If for some reason I need a slower speed (ATC or flap constraint) then I will disconnect the autothrottles and fly that slower speed, declaring it verbally but leaving the groundspeed mini target up as a representation of the inertial state of the aircraft ( hint that more power will be needed, possibly soon)
I will never select a slower airspeed than groundspeed mini with the autothrottles engaged because of the long slow deliberate throttle movements programed into the autothrottles. If putting myself in a situation where rapid throttle response might be required, then I make sure rapid thottle is available...
Cheers
Wino
I think we are closer than you think in our approaches to the aircraft.
I will NEVER select a speed lower than ground speed mini with the autothottles engaged near the ground. If for some reason I need a slower speed (ATC or flap constraint) then I will disconnect the autothrottles and fly that slower speed, declaring it verbally but leaving the groundspeed mini target up as a representation of the inertial state of the aircraft ( hint that more power will be needed, possibly soon)
I will never select a slower airspeed than groundspeed mini with the autothrottles engaged because of the long slow deliberate throttle movements programed into the autothrottles. If putting myself in a situation where rapid throttle response might be required, then I make sure rapid thottle is available...
Cheers
Wino
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hampshire physically; Perthshire and Pembrokeshire mentally.
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Max,
I appreciate the differences between 319s at 55t and 321s at 75t. I've flown all variants within the 320 family and both engine types.
I agree with you about windshear protection in managed with G/S mini. Here's an extract from one of my earlier posts:
Should there be a weather front passing through the airfield or large Cb in the vicinity, rest assured - I'd be in managed. I'd also be landing in Config 3.
Being commercially minded, I'd rather not give the passengers a go-around and an extra approach they haven't paid for if I can avoid it! Adopting selected speed on very short runways in certain circumstances can reduce the likelihood of going around. It's horses for courses.
I appreciate the differences between 319s at 55t and 321s at 75t. I've flown all variants within the 320 family and both engine types.
I agree with you about windshear protection in managed with G/S mini. Here's an extract from one of my earlier posts:
I must stress that I am talking only about approaches in strong gusty winds and their associated low-level turbulence, not about approaches in conditions in which a genuine windshear could be encountered (as opposed to gusts of +/-10 to 15kts, for example).
If you miss yout touch-down-point, you go-around so nothing unsafe there.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe in theory but not in real life, have seen the managed speed above 177 KTS on more than one occasion.
G/S mini in high or gusty winds is like a lawn mower with a really defective governor.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One question, not knowing much about the Bus:
I've read the previous post and I wonder about you're ideea of not being so safe if flying selected due to possible low energy.
What will you do if flying on a busy airport, with high winds (for ex LHR ) and APP instructed you to maintain 160 kt? As I understand ,if flying managed , higher head wind will give a commanded IAS of maybe 175 kt ,am I right?
If the plane ahead ,or behind you , is a 737 , it will keep 160 kt IAS , so the separation will be compromised,I guess.
I've read the previous post and I wonder about you're ideea of not being so safe if flying selected due to possible low energy.
What will you do if flying on a busy airport, with high winds (for ex LHR ) and APP instructed you to maintain 160 kt? As I understand ,if flying managed , higher head wind will give a commanded IAS of maybe 175 kt ,am I right?
If the plane ahead ,or behind you , is a 737 , it will keep 160 kt IAS , so the separation will be compromised,I guess.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hampshire physically; Perthshire and Pembrokeshire mentally.
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You fly the selected speed as instructed by ATC and go managed at 4 miles. Speed regimes at busy airports in the UK are (generally) downwind 220kts; base, intercept and establishing on ILS 180kts then 160kts to 4DME. Separation is not compromised providing one is fairly accurate about flying the ATC speeds.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 30 West
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As wingswinger has said:
"I appreciate the differences between 319s at 55t and 321s at 75t. I've flown all variants within the 320 family and both engine types".
Anyone any thoughts on the problem as it occurs on a 330 at 170-175 tonnes.
"I appreciate the differences between 319s at 55t and 321s at 75t. I've flown all variants within the 320 family and both engine types".
Anyone any thoughts on the problem as it occurs on a 330 at 170-175 tonnes.