Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

CRJ 200 w/CF34-3B1 Question

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

CRJ 200 w/CF34-3B1 Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Apr 2007, 17:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Earth (unfortunately)
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CRJ 200 w/CF34-3B1 Question

This question refers to the CRJ-200 with CF-34-3B1.

Quick question: Is there are mechanical linkage (ie. cables) between the throttle and the engine fuel control unit?

I know in normal N1 speed control the throttle lever position is picked up by a variable resistior in the throttle quadrant, but I would like to know if when operating in N2 mode there is an actual mechanical linkage between throttle and engine fuel control (and if so, I'm assuming you'd have a governor with flyweights in the HMU).

Thanks for your help in advance.

palgia
palgia is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2007, 23:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know the military TF34 has a Woodward "gold coffee can" control closely related to the early CF6 controls (flyweight N2 governor), and I think the CF34-3A/B's are probably similar.
barit1 is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2007, 02:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paglia

Quick question: Is there are mechanical linkage (ie. cables) between the throttle and the engine fuel control unit?

I know in normal N1 speed control the throttle lever position is picked up by a variable resistior in the throttle quadrant, but I would like to know if when operating in N2 mode there is an actual mechanical linkage between throttle and engine fuel control (and if so, I'm assuming you'd have a governor with flyweights in the HMU).
The short answer is yes, there is a mechanical linkage. I should add that N1 speed control doesn't kick in until 79% N1, provided the speed switches are on. These switches are deferrable, however, in which case we are back to all-mechanical controls. The thrust settings get much "jumpier" in that case.

I should also add that the -3A1 engine is the same way.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2007, 02:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nirvana South
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's no difference in the control systems between the 3A& Bs - only the time vs temperature relationships in the EICAS ITT indications change. This is because of the differing engine internal parts. Operators can strap the EICAS to retain A ratings so the increased thrust & temps of the B are taken as increased time between overhaul.

As stated the N2 is controlled via a mechanical link to a Woodward Governor mechanical fuel control and then the N1 Amplifier takes over to control to fan speed. As you're aware, if you lose either engine (have an N1 decrease of 15% or more) after advancing the throttle to TO power, Automatic Performance Reserve (APR) kicks in (a ground from the N1 Amp to the APR Relay) to give you approximately 2% extra thrust on the remaining engine.

RJ-700 & -900s have FADECs and are powered by what is really a completely different engine.
ICT_SLB is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.