Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Engine thrust for taxi 737?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Engine thrust for taxi 737?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th January 2007 | 10:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: sweden
Engine thrust for taxi 737?

I did a search but could not find this question asked before.

How much thrust do you use to get the plane rolling after pushback and what power setting will keep the plane rolling at a constant speed during taxy?

Also, how much tyre drag is generated by the nosewheel in tight turns? i.e. does the 737 slow down a lot when turning into the gate?

I'm asking for desktop simulation realism reasons....

(Is it spelled taxi or taxy btw )
chksix is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 13:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Near LGW
Taxi and Taxying . A light 737 will move under idle thrust. Not sure about cornering though !
yachtno1 is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 13:59
  #3 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Originally Posted by chksix
I did a search but could not find this question asked before.
How much thrust do you use to get the plane rolling after pushback and what power setting will keep the plane rolling at a constant speed during taxy?
Also, how much tyre drag is generated by the nosewheel in tight turns? i.e. does the 737 slow down a lot when turning into the gate?
I'm asking for desktop simulation realism reasons....
(Is it spelled taxi or taxy btw )

1. Impossible to tell (unless you're the designer). It is very much weight dependent. Tiny slope which there is always, makes a lot of difference. Once moving, it may even keep accelerating on idle over even and level ground, Weight again.

2. Dtto. It seems to slow down a little (this must be the case - physics)

3. Always tought this was a uk/us thing. Tire, Tyre.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 16:35
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: sweden
Thanks!

It seems my model is behaving correctly then
chksix is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 16:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
It is recommended that a maximum of 35% N1 is used to start the aircraft moving and after this sufficient power should be maintained to keep the aircraft moving at a constant steady speed. Most operators use a maximum of 25 or 30 kts g/speed. Light weight aircraft, as previously stated perhpas need no increase in power to start moving: heavy aircraft may need 35% ! I have used as much as 45% to get a heavy aircraft moving up a slope !
Luckyguy is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 17:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: north
1. I'm afraid not, X-Plane's brakeaway friction is too high.
You can't design your way around that.

M
XPMorten is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 17:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: R21
A B732 will in most cases start rolling without any thrust application, but the B733/4 need help, and I agree with the 35% to 40% on the latter two types mentioned. For the B732 a maximum of 1.1 EPR is recommended for passenger comfort. By the way, I operate these types out of hot & high airfields, although at high weights these figures are applicable at sea level as well.
Rotates Lowly is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 17:37
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: sweden
The ground friction and tyre model in Xplane is indeed flawed and the interface in PlaneMaker does not provide enough options to tweak it.


Very light rolling resistance is making the plane behave somewhat closer to reality.
chksix is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 20:58
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 26
From: Australia
For the B732 a maximum of 1.1 EPR is recommended for passenger comfort.
.

1.1 for pax comfort? For taxiing? They really must get upset when you apply take off thrust. Doesn't make sense...
Tee Emm is offline  
Reply
Old 25th January 2007 | 10:40
  #10 (permalink)  
Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
From: Rome
Pax confort is not really a factor at that stage. Jet blast is a factor... the FCTM gives guidelines on how to taxi and there are not many ways to do it.
I-2021 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th January 2007 | 20:24
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 9
From: Australia
It is recommended that a maximum of 35% N1 is used to start the aircraft moving
Interesting figure. Request the reference page in the Boeing published FCOM or FCTM for this figure as I could not locate it anywhere.
A37575 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th January 2007 | 03:11
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
The 35% recommendation may be a CFMI request to minimize risk of FOD & erosion. Running static generally causes an inlet vortex to form ahead of the engine, which can pick up trash off the ramp. Once you're rolling the vortex blows away; using the least-possible breakaway thrust is good practice to preserve your engines.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th January 2007 | 10:02
  #13 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Well then. But what about the official guidance, numbers in FCOM/FCTM. I do not recall any (more) but perhaps it is just because it is immposible to have any.

What is the (recommended) maximum for cross-bleed N1, that may give a hint.?
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.