Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Holding: Time correction

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Holding: Time correction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jan 2007, 17:37
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No worries nightowl - thanks for your contribution.
I agree with you.
The 1 sec/kt (or 2kts?) is probably as good as any
Just for the record - 1sec./kt seems to work fairly well.
When do the times start? outbound, abeam or wings level, inbound, at intercept or wings level
I usually use abeam OR wings level, whichever is latest.
Use the FMC
Exactly - but unfortunately my Piper doesn't have one!
Cheers, m'3
minibus3 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2007, 18:54
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nightowl727
I expect the CAA/JAR rules are similar.
No, they're not, which is why you're seeing some divergence of answers. PANS-OPS says:
1.3.3 Allowance for known wind
All procedures depict tracks. Pilots should attempt to maintain the hack by making allowance for known wind by applying corrections both to heading and timing. This should be done during entry and while flying in the holding pattern.
1.3.4 Start of outbound timing
Outbound timing begins over or abeam the fix, whichever occurs later. If the abeam position cannot be determined, start timing when the turn to outbound is completed.
1.5.2 Corrections for wind effect
Due allowance should be made in both beading and timing to compensate for the effects of wind to ensure the inbound track is regained before passing the holding fix inbound. In making these corrections, full use should be made of the indications available from the navaid and estimated or known wind.

Going for a 1-minute inbound leg is a North American thing. It requires a 1.5 sec/knot correction at 120 KTAS. One could argue that PANS-OPS allows an outbound distance equivalent to 1 minute in still air (0.5 sec/knot at 120) or an extended outbound to make the start of the inbound leg at the equivalent still-air position (1.0 sec/knot at 120).
(As a simplistic explanation, 0.5 sec/knot at 120 compensates for the wind on a 1 minute leg, 1.0 sec/knot at 120 compensates for the wind on a 1 minute leg + a 1 minute turn, 1.5 sec/knot at 120 compensates for the wind on a 1 minute leg + a 1 minute turn + the 1 min inbound leg).
Just noticed that keithl has posted similarly about procedures being different. For a 3 minute total from abeam, it's 0.75 sec/knot.
bookworm is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2007, 20:58
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bookworm
No, they're not, which is why you're seeing some divergence of answers. PANS-OPS says ....
Just noticed that keithl has posted similarly about procedures being different.
Yes, difference duly noted - also that the query arose from American practice. Regarding my erroneous assumption, please forgive a benighted colonial; that whole timed-inbound-leg fandango, which over here we are admonished to perform, is so eccentric and obtuse, I just assumed it had to be originally a British thing
Cheers, '27
nightowl727 is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2007, 09:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Scotland
Age: 77
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, I understand that assumption, 'owl, but not guilty on this occasion.

I agree the "one minute inbound" is rather pointless. After all, the outbound leg is the ONLY place where corrections are possible.
keithl is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2007, 20:36
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Empty cruise
Surely you are not talking about correcting the outbound timing so as to achieve a 1 min. inbound leg???
The examples I gave for outbound timings were to illustrate the leg-length required to achieve a turn inbound at a point co-incident with the end of a 1-min outbound leg in still-air. I believe this is the best way of keeping the ground track of holding pattern as close to the still-air racetack pattern as possible. I think that 1 sec for every 2 knots HW is the best compromise between simplicity and accuracy.
I seem to remember that in basic training I was taught to commence timing from the latter of wings level/abeam radial and then note the elapsed time back over the beacon. If the time was greater than 3 mins, the error was halved and subtracted from the previous outbound timing. Similarly, if the time was less than 3 mins, the error was halved and added on. The aim was to achieve a consistent 3-min outbound/turn/inbound segment.
I agree that achieving a 4-minute hold doesn't really matter per se and the aim of the Mental Dead Reckoning is only to ensure that the aircraft stays within the protected area, when there is only an NDB available to fix postion. An FMS or GPS groundtrack achieves this much more accurately than any MDR process. Some larger/faster aircraft are limited to 25 degrees of bank in the turn and hence cannot achieve a Rate 1 turn. The holding pattern will actually take nearer to 5 mins due to longer turns, as is the case with my current aircraft. We don't bother to refine the timing using the previous error, and simply recalculate each time once steady outbound using 1 sec per 2 knots of HW - but that is the great advantage of having an instantaneous wind calculated by INS/FMS.
Brain Potter is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2009, 18:29
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
different rules

IACO rules require a 1 minute outbound leg and don't care what the inbound time is which is much simpler than FAA rules but somewhat less precise. FAA rules require 1 minute inbound leg which is where trying to adjust the outbound leg gets tricky.

My method is to fly the first outbound leg for 1 minute from the abeam point. Then time the inbound leg from the point that I intercept the inbound course line if I fly through it, or wings level on course inbound. If the inbound time is 70 seconds, I know I had a tail wind going outbound. I whip out my trusty E6B and place the 70 second mark under the 60 second mark. The index pointer then points at the new time (51 seconds)I need to fly outbound, which in this case makes sense. I have to shorten my outbound time to allow for the tailwind to get my inbound time down to the 60 second target.
Apache36 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.