Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

sidestick - different inputs

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

sidestick - different inputs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th November 2006 | 01:27
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
From: Nirvana South
Originally Posted by Gary Lager
BAe Systems is currently undergoing development of 'active-stick' technology where sticks are driven/cross-coupled but still retain the features of the FBW sidestick system.
Bombardier originally used a Sterling active sidestick (as recommended by NASA) in their ACT (Active Control Technology) demonstrator but had another version from Lear Siegler for the full flight testing. The software allowed all the required cues such as stick shaker, other stick etc to be programmed in. The demonstrator (Challenger A/C 3991 - ex A/C 1003) was retired to the Canada Aviation Museum in Rockcliffe, Ont. earlier this year.
http://www.aviation.technomuses.ca/c...enger604.shtml

If you're wondering where the sidestick is, it was mounted on the Pilot's side console (just out of frame in the cockpit view). The lefthand yoke was made demountable for the trials.
ICT_SLB is offline  
Reply
Old 8th November 2006 | 09:21
  #22 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Originally Posted by Airbus38
So if both pilots pull hard back at the same time do you get double the pitch rate according to the fact that its a 'summation'?
No, because to total sum is still limited to the magnitude equivalent to single full stick deflection.

Aircraft are not flown by watching steering column deflection, nor by watching control surfaces deflection. Aircraft are flown by setting their attitude which is availible on the attitude indicator. Fact is that on a FBW Airbus there is no other option.

In the LH incident described, the PNF had the benefit of a doubt and took over just in time having no other indication than his PFD. It is a stupid speculation, but imagine if he saw the PF apply correct (in a conventional sense) displacement of controls, 30 (or as I hear 15) centimetres worth of confusion could have been the difference between life and death.

About a month later Turkish AF had a fatal accident with medim size transport turboprop, which left maintenance with crossed controls.


FD.
(the un-real)
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 9th November 2006 | 19:19
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
From: EU
remember your first flying lesson, if the capt says "I have control", answer "you have control",... and that 's all.

no need of stick computers and green or red flashing lights!
dartagnan is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.