Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Cirrus BRS ineffective?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Cirrus BRS ineffective?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Oct 2006, 02:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cirrus BRS ineffective?

Yet another Cirrus Crash, this one apparently due to weather.
I'm just wondering how come they didn't pull the chute handle ?

http://www.katc.com/Global/story.asp?S=5590691
Melax is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2006, 06:53
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cirrus SR-22 crash follow-up

Here's is another link to that crash, a Sports celebrity ...

http://www.whowon.com/sresults.asp?S...StoryID=207561
Melax is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2006, 07:31
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,217
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Reading those news posts, it sounds like you got the title wrong and it should be "pilot training ineffective" ?

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2006, 00:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Durham, NC, USA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deploying the BRS almost guarantees that the airframe will have to be written off. I'd be willing to bet that this has played a factor in some of the crashes where there hasn't been an attempt to activate the 'chute.
uniuniunium is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2006, 01:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: A GOOD PLACE TO FLY, DRINK, **** AND SLEEP.
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps the pilot was too busy checking their insurance policy...... Got to the small print at the bottom, Ah!....paragraph about BRS chutes...... Splat!!!
Too late.


I heard about one that was used in anger. The aircraft still plummeted at a high rate even on the chute. Both occupants had broken legs when the Cirrus thumped down. Ouch!

I wonder if it is better to wear a parachute instead?
JackOffallTrades is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 05:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: what U.S. calls Žold EuropeŽ
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if it is better to wear a parachute instead?
For the pilot, maybe. But for the passengers ? Bailing out 4 persons would not give everyone a chance, I suppose. And in a Mooney, PA28 etc. you can be lucky if you get half the people out of that one single door.

Safety parachutes cannot be compared to the stuff, skydivers are using. The chance to survive the collision with the planet unhurt is really small. All Pilots I know who have bailed out with a rescue parachute had at least a broken ankle.

Anway, statistics for glider pilots wearing parachutes, compared with high performance microlights with an integrated chute, show at least twice the chance of survival for the pilot chute. But statistics, especially on such rare and not comparable events are allways a problem. Maybe after 50 years in service we may rate the value of a built in BRS chute. The first 3 times a Martin-Baker was used were fatal. If it would have been stopped after that, about 1000 pilots would not have been safed later.

I believe BRS has done a great job on the Cirrus, but even they cannot trick physics. You can not develop a chute that opens very quickly at low speed/altitude and opens very gently at high speed. An even if it would, what about high speed/low altitude? There will always be a certain percentage of fatal accidents, where even the best system can not help. And with more than 3000 Cirrus around now, the chance of one crashing is of course high.
Volume is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 09:06
  #7 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Volume

Agree your points. However your stats are a bit wobbly. The first Martin Baker use was Flt Lt J O Lancaster from the AW52 on 30 May 1949 and was successful. They have saved 7170 to date.
John Farley is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 12:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: A GOOD PLACE TO FLY, DRINK, **** AND SLEEP.
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Volume,

I take your point about getting four people out with parachutes. Would be a good bundle for that single door on a Pa28! Could say the same about 200 people bailing out of 8 exits on a airliner too.

My point is a little more simple. 1 pilot to escape, is he better off jumping out with a parachute or staying in the plane and using the BRS?

Two volunteers please!
JackOffallTrades is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2006, 19:59
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: all over the place
Age: 63
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have got one of these Cirrus SR20's. The wing is very sensitive to contamination. Fly in the rain and you lose 10kts IAS. I wouldn't like to play test pilot in icing.
pilotbear is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.