Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Ventral Fins

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Ventral Fins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd August 2006 | 09:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: avalon
Question Ventral Fins

Hello all,
Pardon my limited knowledge.
But why is Ventral Fins installed in some Aircraft type not others?
How does Ventral Fins affect Directional Control?
linksys is offline  
Old 2nd August 2006 | 10:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Oz
Raisbeck put out a promo video for the strakes on the King Air, had some good animations on how it directed airflow. For the Dornier, the venteral fins had the affect of reducing the required rudder defleciton during engine out situations.

Think of it as a "fence" to prevent excessive yawing. I'm sure someone much smarter than I will give you a much more detailed answer!
InTransit is offline  
Old 2nd August 2006 | 19:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
From: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
In simplest terms, it adds to the overall fin area where other vertical fin options are limited. Also useful if the fin needs to be aligned with a low thrust line. An example of both being the CFM Shadow.

GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 2nd August 2006 | 20:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: SEA (or better PAE)
Hello.

usually it is a good sign of a screw up during the design that was found too late in the flight test process or after EIS (entry into service).

You can rarely see it today (on new model a/cs) except on some older models that got new engines, for example, or some other form of upgrade.

Cheers,
Grunf is offline  
Old 3rd August 2006 | 01:34
  #5 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,448
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
"screw up during the design" ... how gauche ... flight test fix, please ...
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 3rd August 2006 | 01:37
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 6
From: La Belle Province
Don't forget that the ventral is in much 'cleaner' air at high AoA than the dorsal; it doesn't have to be a 'screw-up' at all, but could be a considered design choice for high AoA directional stability.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 3rd August 2006 | 02:39
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
The modified B737-700IGW that is now the AEW&C airplane for the RAAF has a couple of ventrals fitted under the aft fuselage, reason, additional directional stability during engine out flight.
The perception is that the vertical stabilizer is partially in the wake of the MESA antenna and is therefore not quite as effective.

In addition, they've moved both the elevator feel pitot tubes to the top of the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer because of turbulence left by the MESA antenna wake in their original position.

These are design features, not screw-ups!

Cheers, FD
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 3rd August 2006 | 06:56
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: avalon
Thanks fellas for the info.
"be yet wiser"
linksys is offline  
Old 3rd August 2006 | 14:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: SEA (or better PAE)
Ok, ok, screw up is a hard statement...

What I wanted to say is that adding ventral fins usually is not something that you pout on your original design...at least, not lately...

Flight test fix - yes...high AoA (after flight test) - yes...

As for 737 in RAAF - this was not the original design neither for 737 nor for its military counterpart...therefore it is still a fix...

Any mod, whatever the purpose, is still a fix...

Not a screw up maybe, only sometimes...
Grunf is offline  
Old 3rd August 2006 | 15:34
  #10 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: EGGW
Snoop

The Boeing 707/720 had to have a ventral fin fitted before it was allowed onto the British register.
But after the incorporation of other mods the requirement was dropped.
Not sure but I thought that they also insisted on a taller fin
gas path is offline  
Old 4th August 2006 | 11:39
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 57
From: Anglia
If you want to see how additional Fins have to be added to straighten an aircraft's performance - Look at a Beech 1900!
Additions to the Tailplane, Keel and Ventral areas, all in a concerted effort to keep it straight.
Rigga is offline  
Old 15th August 2006 | 04:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: KDEN
All those "flight test fixes" made for quite a nice flying aircraft. Incidentally you can ferry the thing with some of those doo dads missing entirely.
Cardinal is offline  
Old 15th August 2006 | 05:17
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
The Learjet 35 has ventral fins to stop it dutch rolling. These were fitted in lieu of a yaw damper. And I think this is why they were fitted to some 707s. It had no yaw damper and dutch rolling was a bit of a problem on these aircraft.
Dan Winterland is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.