Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Engine configurations

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Engine configurations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 10:10
  #21 (permalink)  


Sims Fly Virtually
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shaker/Pusher

Originally Posted by barit1
The 727 in UK registry only required a stickpusher, but not anywhere else IIRC.
I'm pretty sure the lovely old VC-10 had a pusher as well as a shaker (the shaker was just a motor with an out-of-balance flywheel mounted near the bottom of the pole!) And I had the impression that both the BAC 1-11 and the Trident had pushers.

But it was a long time ago, and I didn't fly the 1-11s or Tridents. Anyone with more recent memories?
ExSimGuy is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 11:36
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,507
Received 183 Likes on 101 Posts
I think the point that barit1 was trying to make was that it was only a UK requirement for the 727 to have a stick pusher. As it was/is for the other UK registered T tails. Trident, 1-11, VC-10 etc. Not sure about the DC9/MD80 as McDonnel Douglas is just Heath Robinson having a laugh!


Coming back to my earlier point about the tail mounted engines and the deep stall. I always understood that an a/c with wing mounted engines has the ability to 'power out' of a stall whereas tail mounted engines will stall/surge in a deep stall as the disrupted airflow over the wing disturbs the airflow into the engine intakes. IE 1-11.

The original design for the 757 had a T-tail and wing mounted engines. Would this have suffered from an unrecoverable deep stall?
TURIN is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 16:45
  #23 (permalink)  


Sims Fly Virtually
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, "wing shadow" does cause problems for rear-mounted engines,as well as for the tail control surfaces.

Not sure if "powering out" would help much (anyone ttried it?) either with rear engines or even with wing-mounted - I suspect the wing-mounted engines (below the wing) would tend to give you a pitch-up moment, which is the last thing you need when you do not have the tail to control pitch. I have heard the idea suggested (at least, for tail-mount engines)
ExSimGuy is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2006, 18:16
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: world
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whenever we did airtests on the VC10 (four engines tail mounted) we had an extra cockpit instrument added which displayed angle of attack. There was a limit beyond which we were warned not to go, lest a deep stall set in. There was apparently no recovery possible from this deep stall except by utilising the tail parachute they fitted only to the original test aircraft on which they defined the safe operational envelope.

Hope this helps. BRGDS
Oldy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.