B737 - self reversing from stand
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NW
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B737 - self reversing from stand
Watching the news about the hurricane at New Orleans, I started thinking about a visit I made there in the 80's.
I seem to remember that B737's were able to do their own-push back and reverse from the stand.
In all of the years since, and several hundred airports, I haven't seen this done anywhere else.
Did I dream this?
I seem to remember that B737's were able to do their own-push back and reverse from the stand.
In all of the years since, and several hundred airports, I haven't seen this done anywhere else.
Did I dream this?
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cannot speak for N O but it used to be a 'specifically-authorised pilots only' manoeuvre for the 737-100/200 but verboten on the 300 onwards due to the high risk of debris ingestion/engine surge.
I guess in a real emergency I would still do it but I must remember not to stop using the brakes............
I guess in a real emergency I would still do it but I must remember not to stop using the brakes............
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As always BOAC is correct. Had the pleasure of marshalling a 737/200 off of stand about 4 years ago. It was based in Africa and the front gear had a particular pair of ski's connected to it for landing in dessert conditions, thus not allowing any towbar to be connected.
Don't really see much of that any more, all you get nowaday's is Ryanairs 737/200s using reverse thrust along the taxi ways to slow them down from 90kts taxi speed
S.C.
Don't really see much of that any more, all you get nowaday's is Ryanairs 737/200s using reverse thrust along the taxi ways to slow them down from 90kts taxi speed
S.C.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd recon that (in extremis) any aircraft with reverse thrust could "power back". As to whether or not is allowed by the AOM (for the good reasons mentioned earlier) or God's Gods of Aviation (the local airport managers) is a different matter. Going back a few years, an Aeroflot IL62 did it's own "pushback" at LHR (there was some dispute with the Soviets) and they were refused ground handling.
However, it's amazing how quickly the rules change when you are blocking a stand which is required!
However, it's amazing how quickly the rules change when you are blocking a stand which is required!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Blighty - On secondment
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
USAF C5s all self pushed on their recent visits to Shannon. Very impressive to watch. Not sure if it was because the gorund equipment wasn't avail for a tug to push them back. Couple of pallets wobbled on the ramp as the engines powered up!
Saw this Jetstream 41 pushing itself back at Ronaldsway last week during a brief visit there. Looked great seeing it in action.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?i...next_id=832971
Saw this Jetstream 41 pushing itself back at Ronaldsway last week during a brief visit there. Looked great seeing it in action.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?i...next_id=832971
Last edited by Global Pilot; 29th Aug 2005 at 10:34.
Makes a difference on what power is needed to get the tyres rolling vs inlet lip height from the ground to avoid vortex entry into the engine.
Once you get it moving the problem of reingestion/surge disappear when you're moving backward under reverse thrust.
Once you get it moving the problem of reingestion/surge disappear when you're moving backward under reverse thrust.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can only say for a B737-200, it’s not a recommended procedure, however the aircraft can physically do it. It has being successfully done at max all up weight on a level surface out of a bay and partially turned into the lane. At most African airports simple things like tugs/ tow bars / Tow link fitting are luxury items. I also heard a KLM 747 had done it at a African airport. forced to divert due wx.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SEA (or better PAE)
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello.
For 737 after Series 200 this is not a valid loadcase analyzed because of several warnings from regulatory bodies (FAA and other CAAs).
Therefore it is not a recommended practice. Of course, you can do it, probably on all 737s, including NGs but…
I you have any kind of structural issues with this you will get a "we told you" type of answer.
Usually, this is never a ground loadcase you're looking into.
Nor is, when we talk about these things, riding on tarmac with one engine shut off (Air Canada pilots on CRJ 200 loved this practice)!
Cheers
For 737 after Series 200 this is not a valid loadcase analyzed because of several warnings from regulatory bodies (FAA and other CAAs).
Therefore it is not a recommended practice. Of course, you can do it, probably on all 737s, including NGs but…
I you have any kind of structural issues with this you will get a "we told you" type of answer.
Usually, this is never a ground loadcase you're looking into.
Nor is, when we talk about these things, riding on tarmac with one engine shut off (Air Canada pilots on CRJ 200 loved this practice)!
Cheers
Dont forget the Air Florida accident at Washington in 1982. Part of the reason for the snow accumulation on the wings was thought to be that it was blown up from the ramp during power back.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not just 737's either in the USA. I've seen it done on DC9's and 727s extensively (and exclusively - no tugs used anywhere in sight in those days) at St Louis, Mo.
Also witnessed it at Atlanta, LaGuardia and ORD although not exclusive means of pushback. I'm talking 1976-78 timeframe, don't remember seeing it done in the 80's, but you know what they say.
Also witnessed it at Atlanta, LaGuardia and ORD although not exclusive means of pushback. I'm talking 1976-78 timeframe, don't remember seeing it done in the 80's, but you know what they say.
Reminds me of the day at MAN circa 1982 when Captain was advised by agent that he would not be able to depart as pushback crew on strike.
Well, you have guessed it they backed off the stand with lookouts and permission from the Airport Authority.
When I did me B707 P2 to P1 Upgrade at Prestwick (about 1974 ish) we were taught how to move the aircraft backwards with use of reverse. Great fun! Main thing is not to touch the brakes - just cancel reverse when you want to stop and, obviously, make sure all is clear behind.
If icing conditions such as snow etc prevail then, if my memory is correct, ANY selection of reverse means back to the ramp for another deice - post the B737 accident at Washington.
Well, you have guessed it they backed off the stand with lookouts and permission from the Airport Authority.
When I did me B707 P2 to P1 Upgrade at Prestwick (about 1974 ish) we were taught how to move the aircraft backwards with use of reverse. Great fun! Main thing is not to touch the brakes - just cancel reverse when you want to stop and, obviously, make sure all is clear behind.
If icing conditions such as snow etc prevail then, if my memory is correct, ANY selection of reverse means back to the ramp for another deice - post the B737 accident at Washington.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Pan-Am had it as an SOP at Heathrow with their German route 727s in the 1980's, presumably to save money when they were on their last legs. No drama with the high engines, just used 1 & 3 as I recall.
Never saw a Trident try it.
We officially disapprove of it at Gatwick, though as Piltdown Man says, amazing how expediency can change things! There's no reason why we can't do it, we do need to see that there's no alternative pushback arrangement available before approving it.
We did once literally push an Embraer once with half a dozen blokes on the leading edge; wasn't very difficult to get moving. However, the following day the a/c Commander had obviously thought about the potential damage to his leading edges and we had to clear an adjacent stand so it could 'spin' out instead.
Cheers,
The Odd One
Never saw a Trident try it.
We officially disapprove of it at Gatwick, though as Piltdown Man says, amazing how expediency can change things! There's no reason why we can't do it, we do need to see that there's no alternative pushback arrangement available before approving it.
We did once literally push an Embraer once with half a dozen blokes on the leading edge; wasn't very difficult to get moving. However, the following day the a/c Commander had obviously thought about the potential damage to his leading edges and we had to clear an adjacent stand so it could 'spin' out instead.
Cheers,
The Odd One
Paxing All Over The World
When my nephew was driving J41s, they would often powerback and the precaution was to just blip the throttle to break out and then close and drift. Once she had stopped THEN apply the brakes and prepare to move forward. As I recall, the intakes for the Garretts (I think they are) face slightly up.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Over The Hills And Far Away
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's fine if you have a turboprop or low-bypass jet with bucket or cascade vanes. But please don't try it with a hi-bypass with fan reversers. That is just looking for trouble.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Thailand
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many moons ago a Super Constellation AEW landed at Lossiemouth for a joint exercise with the RAF. Come the time to taxy out, the marshaller thought the space to turn was too tight so he signalled the Connie to reverse, all quite legal for the aircraft so to do. After a few frowns from the flight crew, the F/E set reverse and wound on 1200RPM. The result was that the marshaller was sent about 40m across the apron. He suffered nothing more than a loss of dignity and dirty fingernails!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by CaptainSandL
Dont forget the Air Florida accident at Washington in 1982. Part of the reason for the snow accumulation on the wings was thought to be that it was blown up from the ramp during power back.
Dont forget the Air Florida accident at Washington in 1982. Part of the reason for the snow accumulation on the wings was thought to be that it was blown up from the ramp during power back.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: dubai
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Risky to say the least. 2 reasons.
1/ If the A/C is braked using wheel brakes, then the chances of it sitting on it's a**** are high.
2/ When reverse is used at low speeds or stationary, then the risk of injestion, therefore FOD damage is high.
The crew will not know the extent of this damage untill the engines are stationary and a visual inspection of the 1st stage fan is carried out.
1/ If the A/C is braked using wheel brakes, then the chances of it sitting on it's a**** are high.
2/ When reverse is used at low speeds or stationary, then the risk of injestion, therefore FOD damage is high.
The crew will not know the extent of this damage untill the engines are stationary and a visual inspection of the 1st stage fan is carried out.
Moderator
I recall my Electra endorsement many moons ago and the IP's demo of taxyway 3-point turns. Couldn't see all that much as the whole endorsement was done at night due availability (which was a bit naughty in itself) but the demo was impressive.