Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737 Classic - Exceedance of LED Extension speed

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737 Classic - Exceedance of LED Extension speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd May 2005, 12:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
B737 Classic - Exceedance of LED Extension speed

To my knowledge there is no specific mention in Vol 1 or 2 of a maximum speed with leading edge devices extended. It is alluded to in the QRH for Alternate Flap selection where arming of the Alternate Flaps Master Switch takes place at a max speed of 230 knots. However, in that excellent publication, 737 Cockpit Companion, at page 9 it states max speed LED extended 230 knots.

In the real aircraft and also for the 737-200, if the speed exceeded 230 knots during acceleration during flap retraction to flaps up, it was not unusual to see the LED amber light stay on because the LED were prevented from complete retraction due excessive speed. The fix of course was to reduce speed to below 230 knots and the LED would come fully in and the LED light would extinguish. Has anyone experienced this event in normal operations?

In one particular 737-300 simulator I operate, the events described above are well demonstrated along with the low frequency vibration that can warn the pilot of an LED still hanging out due excess speed. However on another simulator-a 737-400 type, it doesn't matter how fast you go - 260-270 knots or more, the LED will always retract normally - in other words excess speed does not affect LED retraction in that particular Level 5 simulator.

My understanding from the technicians that run the -400 simulator is as there is no published limit in Vol1 or Vol 2, for LED extension the LED simulator software ensures that the LED will always retract fully in spite of high speed (above 230 knots for instance). Does this mean that the fidelity of the -400 simulator is not true compared with the same event in the 737-300 simulator of another operator?

If the speed exceeds 230 knots in the real aircraft while the LED are in the process of retracting, I have observed that the LED will stay stuck out until the speed is reduced. That said, would it be correct to say that 737-400 simulator should correctly reflect the aircraft experience?

Otherwise I would have thought that crews trained on the 737-400 simulator would assume that there is no problem with high speed LED retraction as the LED will always come in as normal?
Centaurus is offline  
Old 22nd May 2005, 16:27
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NB: Flap1 limit for 2/3/500 is 230kts (ie Leds extended).

For 400 it is 250kts due to higher weights and min clean requirements.
BOAC is offline  
Old 22nd May 2005, 19:14
  #3 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately we experienced what you described in your first two paragraphs out of Gatwick about 15 years ago in a -200. Exactly as described. When the speed was reduced below 230, they retracted with a what seemed like a bit of a bang. We discontinued the flight and landed back doing a flapless. No damage apart from to pride.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 22nd May 2005, 22:17
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Rainboe. Interesting one, that. If the LED did not initially retract because you were too fast, but they did finally retract when you reduced below 230 or thereabouts, would it have been necessary to do a flapless, when the LED had already returned to normal operation? On the other hand perhaps it was a prudent decision to be balanced against high touch-down speeds and increased risk of tyre failure or hot brakes.
Centaurus is offline  
Old 25th May 2005, 12:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Their logic probably went to that a bang isn't very normal is it, if the LED's still should be operating normally.
I suppose you could take the Flaps to 1 and see what happens, you can also use a 10000' runway and the brakes will be no issue
Shaka Zulu is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.