Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Nose gear lifting and parking brake.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Nose gear lifting and parking brake.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2005, 09:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Morocco
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nose gear lifting and parking brake.

Dear all,

Prior to push back from stand, ground crew asks to set the parking brakes in order to lift the nose gear.

Doesn't it put a sensible amount of torque stress on the main wheel gears with brakes on?

As a lift of around 2-3 feet, an arm length of 40-50 feet ( middle sized aircraft) will induce a couple of degrees of torque: could we assume that this stress is absorbed in tire flexibility?

Which method would you recommend?
izatrue is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 09:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vilha Abrao
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For my opinion neglicable compared to forces at normal braking.

regards
catchup is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 09:52
  #3 (permalink)  
Transparency International
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Denmark
Posts: 747
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Provided your tires are round the a/c will rotate around the tire/tarmac contact point = no problem whatsoever.
dusk2dawn is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 09:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to mention those pesky bogie beam pivots
SeldomFixit is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 17:26
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Morocco
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well the truth is, i was deferently asked by a ground mechanics why some operators insist on lifting the plane with brakes released: i told him i didn't really have a precise answer, all i could think of immediately against the idea was about having a backup in case the pushback truck skidded on a possibly greasy tarmack, slopy stand...

so, catchup, you have a point here

dusk2dawn Provided your tires are round the a/c will rotate around the tire/tarmac contact point = no problem whatsoever.
remember: with parking brake on, no rotation whatsoever is to be allowed, even on round tires
izatrue is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 18:47
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Iza,

towbarless only lift the ac approx 2 inches => practially no torque stress...

/fs
Flap Sup is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 19:54
  #7 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: South East
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no movement with the parking brake set, no movement of the aircraft relative to the wheel. There is however the wheel rotating on the ground as the nose wheel is lifted....thus no force. Remember the wheel is braked relative to the a/c and not the ground, in effect even with the brake set when the nose is lifted the main wheel rotates fractionaly with respect to the ground, only a few mm but enough.

I would have to agree with DawntoDusk
batty is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 23:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Sandpit
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You guys have all missed Seldom fixit's subtle comment.

There are lots of a/c out there with double, triple or more axle bogies. If the wheel rotated about it's contact patch then a/c with multiple axle bogies would have a problem.As usual the answer is a bit more complicated.

On single axle bogies yes, the wheel will rotate slightly relative to the ground not the a/c.

On multiple axle bogies, the bogie simply tilts slightly.

However, as the a/c is lifted vertically in effect it is pulled slightly forward. The forces acting on the wheel/tyre are minimal when compared to the same forces while braking.

I would always keep the brake on just in case.

Edited for clarification.
mono is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 06:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: farrrr east
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

perhaps a relook at the towing manual for the procedures maybe required, to see if it's brakes on or off for lifting.
allthatglitters is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 08:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: france
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hello everyone,

i think technically there is no real problem with lifting the nose gear with or without parkbrakes on.

it is more of a safety concern for the groundstaff around the aircraft to have the parkbrake on, same procedure as when connecting/disconnecting a classic towbar.

i had one airline where they insisted on parkb. on before lifting & another one where no guidelines where given, with some ground engineers asking for pb on before lifting & others asking the contrary. a bit confusing i admit. the real problem is not being pushed with the parkingbrakes still on, especially when english is not the first langage of the groundcrew.
blackmail is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 10:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NL
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have to disagree with Dusk2Dawn and Batty, since the aircraft will have to be lifted along the arc prescribed by the nosegear with the centrepoint at (actually very near to but not at) the contact point of the main gear wheel with the surface.
Since the aircraft is lifted verically there will be a force at the nosegear and/or main gear.

The smaller the arm between nose and main gear gets, the bigger this effect will be. Just try lifting the nose gear of a Warrior 3 feet vertically and see what happens.

I would say this force is negligable on longer aircraft but if not, this could possibly be fixed by releasing the parking brake on the tow truck. The truck will be pulled forward slightly while lifting the nosegear.

Is this possibly a procedure in use.....

Ziggy
Ziggy is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 17:31
  #12 (permalink)  
Transparency International
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Denmark
Posts: 747
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just where does this magical
centrepoint at (actually very near to but not at) the contact point of the main gear wheel with the surface
come from ?

If you lift a Warrior 3 feet vertically, you will turn it around its tail skid

Anyway, got boogie - they can lift us as they please - aint movin nowhere before I release the brakes.
dusk2dawn is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 18:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vilha Abrao
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The biggest problem when lifting the nlg are the air/grd sensors. They turn completely mad and the aircraft does'nt know what's going on. The computers get confused about offblock-time, the pressurisation pumps the cabin up, the ins(irs) sense a too high altitude, and so on.
So, its one of the reasons we earn so much money, cause we make it all work after such a mess.

regards
catchup is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 18:54
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: leafy suburbs
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my experience - Brakes on , towbarless tractor positions (but does not lift) when brakes are indicated off then the tractor lifts. As for sensors etc - the nose leg oleo stays compressed so the sensors etc do no move so the as far as the aircraft is concerned it is still on the ground. Catchup - if you are getting the warnings you describe then your aircraft has a problem!
keel beam is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 18:57
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vilha Abrao
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
. . . . . . . . . .
catchup is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 20:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope CATCHUP is flying a chopper !!!! Big problems if he isn't
SeldomFixit is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2005, 11:59
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Europe
Age: 63
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do not really think we have a problem. Anybody want to calculate the movement of the pivots in the main gear. Letīs say we have 20 meters between nose and main gear, and the nose is raised 5 cm off the ground with park brake set. If these forces were too much to handle for the jet, I wouldnīt want to sit in it during flight, let alone landing!
Charles Darwin is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2005, 12:19
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 84
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually there is no problem at all. Bogie landing gears are usually designed so that the leg can rotate relative to the bogie, even when the brakes are applied. The brake units are attached to brake rods which transmit the brake torque into the leg. If the nose of the aircraft is raised causing the MLG leg to tilt backwards, the brake units will rotate on the axle by the same amount, while the bogie remains parallel to the ground.
supercarb is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2005, 23:55
  #19 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Wink

Warning! Thread Hijack in progress!! Using the towbar-less tug method - does it really save a lot on manpower? Is the saving in another direction??

--------------------
"I tell you, we are here on Earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2005, 04:38
  #20 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

It saves a small fortune in tow bars...
Blacksheep is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.