Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Auto Throttle vs Noise

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Auto Throttle vs Noise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2004, 14:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: around
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Auto Throttle vs Noise

Reading HTBJ and found something which I cannot work out. A number of methods are mentioned on how to reduce noise on final appch. One is not to use Auto Throttle.

How does having the auto throttle engaged increase engine noise and is their policies at some aerodromes/companies relating to their use.
HEALY is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2004, 14:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When using auto throttle the amount of thrust varies up and down which I assume you know. Sometimes the thrust is lower than a steady state approach setting and sometimes the thrust is higher. You end up with noise spikes when the thrust is higher. More thrust = More noise.

A person looking at monitor data vs. the certified EPNL of the aircraft may wonder why the aircraft monitors way above it's certified levels. Auto throttle is usually responsible for this.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2004, 08:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

747FOCAL; one aircraft widely known to measure higher than its certified EPNLs on approach is the RR powered 747-400. The GE and PW variants appear fine by all accounts. By that reckoning, are you implying that RR aircraft routinely use auto throttle but GE and PW powered -400s do not.

Care to elaborate?

My understanding is that auto throttle simply causes frequent variations in power setting, thus causing transient noise, which is sometimes cited as more annoying than a steady state level.
miss_heard is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2004, 18:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I told you what I know about the RR powered 747-400 and 767 and the "noise" you talk about I would have to kill you.


Auto throttle does cause all aircraft that use it to sometimes be louder and sometimes be quieter than certified. Well accept for the above mentioned aircraft.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2004, 18:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Original message Deleted answered through PM.


Mutt.

Last edited by mutt; 12th Nov 2004 at 19:52.
mutt is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2004, 19:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Mutt, I totally agree... 747FOCAL should tell us what he (or she) knows about the RR 747/767!!

Mutt, for info, the 'widely known' noise readings I was referring to are published in the following report (see Figure 8 for the RR powered 747/767 noise results)

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/ERCD0205.PDF

(dial-up users beware though - it's nearly 9MB!)
miss_heard is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2004, 13:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

sorry to bump this but still waiting for a response (of some sorts) from 747FOCAL. Are you gonna reply?
miss_heard is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2004, 13:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I already told in private to people I am familiar with at PPRUNE.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2004, 19:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

OK fair enough, but can I politely suggest then that you stop posting messages along the lines of "If you only knew what I new..." on a PUBLIC forum such as this one. Doing so is pointless if you have absolutely no intention of backing up your 'talk' with actual facts (if they exist) and it just makes you sound self-important.
miss_heard is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2004, 20:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skagness on the beach
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am important in my own world...............

I did tell those I am familiar with. I do not know you and in defense of the industry I chose to make the information private.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2004, 03:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
miss_heard,

747FOCAL replied to me via PM. His reasoning makes sense and in this corporate world of ours, i can understand why he doesnt want it made public......

Sorry, but i cant share his information.

Mutt.
mutt is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.