Engaging VNAV at 400ft in 737NG
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Middle East
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engaging VNAV at 400ft in 737NG
Is it done or not done?
Seems like a good idea to me, gives you protection against overspeeding the flaps.
Or do you clean up first, and then engage it?
Just curious
Seems like a good idea to me, gives you protection against overspeeding the flaps.
Or do you clean up first, and then engage it?
Just curious
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Speed limit for flap 5 is 250 kt's,I think it's not something to worry on take off.
Unlike classic where is 230 kts.
You can select vnav,but how will you handle the noise procedure,for ex. 1000' N1 ,then 3000' up. You'll have N1 at 400' . Not such a big thing on a 737,but if you want to follow the rules....
Unlike classic where is 230 kts.
You can select vnav,but how will you handle the noise procedure,for ex. 1000' N1 ,then 3000' up. You'll have N1 at 400' . Not such a big thing on a 737,but if you want to follow the rules....
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ca, USA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hummm why is it that SWA's Efis MASI for a flaps 5 TO has a **LIMIT** speed arc of 190 to 250? I mean the yellow limit arc that is not present on the standard PFD. This is removed once you go flaps 1 in clb but does not make any sense seeing that limit for 5 is 250!
Any SWA pilots who can comment on this strange limit arc?
crvm
Any SWA pilots who can comment on this strange limit arc?
crvm
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
quietwing,
yes that could work, but when you pass the acceleration altitude, isn't it going to accelerate unrestricted?
You'd loose 250 below 10...
Anyways, not a good practice. Also not applicable for a flaps 15 takeoff.
yes that could work, but when you pass the acceleration altitude, isn't it going to accelerate unrestricted?
You'd loose 250 below 10...
Anyways, not a good practice. Also not applicable for a flaps 15 takeoff.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We in our airline, stick to VNAV only after cleanup due to LE flaps extended speed restriction. It is very easy to exceed the LE FLAPS ext. speed in the VNAV mode if one of them is stuck during retraction due the FCC only monitoring the TE FLAP position. Once the Crew confirms FLAPS UP NO LIGHT, VNAV is all yours.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Capt.topgun. Good point about LED speed limit. Does the SOP of your airline require a specific call by the PNF of "flaps up-no lights", as soon as the action is complete (confirmed later by the After Takeoff Checklist). Some operators follow the Boeing SOP meaning no specific call as the flaps hit up and the LED light goes out. This has led to neither pilot monitoring the flap retract sequence of events until some time later when the After Takeoff Checklist is called for. By that time it may be too late to prevent overspeed of the LED if in fact they are still extended for some reason or another.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hudson,
Our SOP procedure is ditto as Angel's except there is no restriction of 3000' for engaging VNAV (with no noise abetment required). The moment PNF calls "Flaps UP No Light", PF verifies it and then asks for VNAV as the climb mode. Passing TA, "After T/o C/L" is carried out which confirms the above once again ( Though its a tad late for the LED speed to be observed as u are already doing 250 K ) Pretty satisfactory procedure IMHO.
Keep it safe out there,
Our SOP procedure is ditto as Angel's except there is no restriction of 3000' for engaging VNAV (with no noise abetment required). The moment PNF calls "Flaps UP No Light", PF verifies it and then asks for VNAV as the climb mode. Passing TA, "After T/o C/L" is carried out which confirms the above once again ( Though its a tad late for the LED speed to be observed as u are already doing 250 K ) Pretty satisfactory procedure IMHO.
Keep it safe out there,
Last edited by capt.topgun; 26th May 2004 at 08:31.