Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

PICMA - Pilot in command Monitored Approach

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

PICMA - Pilot in command Monitored Approach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Dec 2003, 03:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Oz
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PICMA - Pilot in command Monitored Approach

Gidday Nigels,
What is the latest on these types of approaches??
Weather close to minima then F/O flies and Captain manages in an unloaded environment - Captain takes over at the minima and lands or if not visual, F/O carries out miss.

Does your airline fly this system?

Did your airline fly this system once and has since changed to another - if so - why?

Precision (only CAT1 in this neck of the woods) and non precision - comments welcome.

Scuttle has it there is a move away from PICMA - why is it so?

Good subject this - let her rip Nigels and Merry Christmas Shags

Baby Diesel
Baby Diesel is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2003, 03:50
  #2 (permalink)  
MasterBates
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
My company used to have the F/O´s flying the CAT 2 apps, but then it was moved to the captain. Reason given was that a switching of controls is better under more relaxed cincumstances. In sims, there were alway instances of premature ejacul... sorry, go-arounds if the captein hesitated a little at minimums. Now the old man does the approach (actually George does) and he is on the lookout and the wheel throughout the last phase. The F/O is glued to the instruments all the way down. We are very happy with this arrangement and beleave it is working very well.

MB.
 
Old 28th Dec 2003, 03:55
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Oz
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Thanks for the replies.

Interested to hear from any Airbus drivers out there on this subject.

What is the philosophy coming out of Toulouse in this area ?

The only small arguement is the low level takeover especially from a non runway aligned NPA but you are usually taking it from George anyway.

The heads up pilot should definitely transition better to the visual but does he have the aircraft "feel" from not being "on" the controls?? (even though George should be flying )

Would appreciate your input.

Baby Diesel
Baby Diesel is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2003, 05:25
  #4 (permalink)  
m&v
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: delta.bc.canada
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
any aircraft that can 'do' a single eng'AutoLand in zero vis' conditions isn't all bad.Well that was my statement to people who queried the difference from the 727/320..
PMA approaches developed by british european in the late 50-60's.Had 'checkered' acceptance by BOAC crews after the meld.
Used by some Airforces around the world(Canada)and by Canada3000(military influence??)..The majority of Co's seemed to have adopted Fail operational Autoland,with 2 managers??
The Cat3 'headsup displays'enable the non 'autoland'people to get lower to see...(that should throw the cat among the chickens)
Cheers
m&v is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.