Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

RVR measurement

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

RVR measurement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Dec 2001, 16:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 73
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post RVR measurement

When RVR is measured by an obsever, can anyone tell me what height above the runway it is supposed to be done? I seem to remember from my CPL met days that it was about 12 feet but can't be sure.
Offchocks is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2001, 18:29
  #2 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking

Gday Fella, it probably depends on the temperature but if the airfield doesn't have automatic equipment (like Melbourne) and it is Winter, then it is normally done from the sitting position in the front seat of the 4x4 that the observer is sitting in.

Sorry I couldn't be more help than that!
Keg is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2001, 18:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

5 metres above ground is the figure in my old MO Observers Handbook.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2001, 20:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

According to CAP168 the observers eye height should be 5m above the runway surface
JuicyLucy is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2002, 05:30
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 73
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks everyone......Keg having watched them do it at SYD during the past week, I was concerned with the method used i.e. front seat of a 4WD.
I remembered approximately the method used in Europe in the old days and have also seen it done in AKL in the last year or so.
So one has to ask how accurate these SYD readings were? I have my doubts!
Offchocks is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2002, 03:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Are there any ATC people who can help?

Years ago, the fire service would count lights from the cab of the fire truck. (3 m above ground)

The met people should be using 5 m. A 4 wd assessment is not really valid.

Better still electronic measurement.
Arctaurus is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2002, 03:42
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Post

... at LST in the fogginess of darkest winter night ... I recall a useful alternative .. ... the crew would line up ... count lights ... one (on the left) .. two (on the right) and so forth ... seemed to work pretty well ..
john_tullamarine is online now  
Old 6th Jan 2002, 21:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Localiser backcourse 31
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Canadian practice (AIP RAC 9.20 et sequ) dictates using the term RVR when visibility measured electronically with some form of automatic sensor. Runway lights set at levels 1-3 for 'normal' reporting. If settings of 4 or 5 are used then ATC will give RVR and light setting used.

If Mk I eyeball used then the term is "Ground visibility". How ATC measure this is a closely guarded secret, but may involve runway lights <img src="smile.gif" border="0">

Rgds
CB

[ 06 January 2002: Message edited by: Code Blue ]</p>
Code Blue is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2002, 23:42
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,915
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

In the UK the term IRVR (Instrumented Runway Visual Range) refers to electronic measurement. The 'Human Observer' method gives RVR, although in either case normally passed on the R/T as "RVR".
The Official Met. visibility is assessed by a qualified 'Met. Observer', who will either be a Met. Office employee, or more usually these days, at Civil Airports, a member of the ATC staff who has obtained the appropriate training and qualification.
spekesoftly is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2002, 19:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I remember at EGSS in the mid 80's that the RVR collection process was very much the human observer method. Basically, there was a shed on stilts on the eastern side of the runway. In this shed was a heater, a telephone and a decode sheet. Every 30 mins the tower would phone up and you would count how many opposite side runway edge lights you could see - "x" many= 400m "y" many = 450m and so on, not very scientific, and a damn lonely job punctuated only by the discrete pile of "adult" reading material (ahem!!) that got the poor unfortunate through a foggy night shift!! <img src="smile.gif" border="0"> <img src="smile.gif" border="0"> <img src="smile.gif" border="0">
frazhm is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.