Aircraft washing
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's exactly what I meant. If it were a maintenance procedure, I would guess that there would be a jobcard to prepare the aicraft before washing, and then to ensure that all blanks etc. are removed on completion.
Guest
Posts: n/a
320Driver, there are or should be aircraft wash prep and post wash work cards that WILL be signed by an authorised/approved person. The actual task as such is normally carried out by companies with dedicated a/c wash teams, although they are not likely to be a/c mech/tech or eng. Depending on the type of wash it may neccessitate, landing gear and/or flying control re-lubrication.
Post wash card should include checking all the ports/probes etc.
Post wash card should include checking all the ports/probes etc.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Amen to that, Spanners. At one company I worked for, the guys washing the a/c were the same guys cleaning the lunchroom. Knew about cleaning...knew $hit about aircraft!!
They washed one, one night, and decided to cover the static ports with masking tape, which when soaked becomes nearly invisible when on a titanium surface. They forgot to remove it, and it was missed on subsequent walk-arounds. At the time, there was no work card in force for washing the a/c. The a/c went flying with a full load of pax.
F/O noticed no increase in indicated altitude, but noticed the trees were getting smaller!! Capt declared an emergency, a/c landed safely. Luckily, wx was cavok.
Just proves a point... NO-ONE should be allowed to do ANYTHING to an aircraft without the proper training. By the way, the company , at the stern insistance of Transport Canada, had a work card done up the next day!!
---------------------------------------------
"You want it on the gate for WHEN??"
They washed one, one night, and decided to cover the static ports with masking tape, which when soaked becomes nearly invisible when on a titanium surface. They forgot to remove it, and it was missed on subsequent walk-arounds. At the time, there was no work card in force for washing the a/c. The a/c went flying with a full load of pax.
F/O noticed no increase in indicated altitude, but noticed the trees were getting smaller!! Capt declared an emergency, a/c landed safely. Luckily, wx was cavok.Just proves a point... NO-ONE should be allowed to do ANYTHING to an aircraft without the proper training. By the way, the company , at the stern insistance of Transport Canada, had a work card done up the next day!!
---------------------------------------------
"You want it on the gate for WHEN??"
Guest
Posts: n/a
It might be usefully reserved as a duty for badly behaved techs. Better still, as a duty for pilots who have transgressed.
I used to work next to an airfield fire station, where the chief fireman seemed to use washing the fire engines in that way to good effect.
G
I used to work next to an airfield fire station, where the chief fireman seemed to use washing the fire engines in that way to good effect.
G
Guest
Posts: n/a
Smurfjet - In relation to dangers highlighted above -
After washing an AeroPeru 757, workers did not remove adhesive tape that obstructed static ports. Occurred in 1996 near Lima, Peru. 70 people perished in that accident.
Not washing per se but improper or lack of procedures wrt ports, Birgenair 757 of Puerto Plata in Dominican Republic (c 1996) stalled due to incorrect airspeed warnings - subsequently causing the crew to ignore stall warnings. The probable cause of obstruction was surmised to be mud/debris from small insect(s) introduced to the pitot tube during the 20 days that the a/c was on the ground. The pitot-static system was not verified prior to re-introduction to service.
After washing an AeroPeru 757, workers did not remove adhesive tape that obstructed static ports. Occurred in 1996 near Lima, Peru. 70 people perished in that accident.
Not washing per se but improper or lack of procedures wrt ports, Birgenair 757 of Puerto Plata in Dominican Republic (c 1996) stalled due to incorrect airspeed warnings - subsequently causing the crew to ignore stall warnings. The probable cause of obstruction was surmised to be mud/debris from small insect(s) introduced to the pitot tube during the 20 days that the a/c was on the ground. The pitot-static system was not verified prior to re-introduction to service.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Actually, there in the US, there IS a legal requirement to wash the aircraft prior to maitenance. When doing an annual or 100 HR FAR Part 43, Appendix D:
(a) Each person performing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall, before
that inspection, remove or open all necessary inspection plates, access
doors, fairing, and cowling. He shall thoroughly clean the aircraft and
aircraft engine.
Now, I'm not sure how this translates into airline maintenance (part 121 ops)... Now, of course, whether this reg is put into practice is another issue altogether!!!!
Cheers
(a) Each person performing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall, before
that inspection, remove or open all necessary inspection plates, access
doors, fairing, and cowling. He shall thoroughly clean the aircraft and
aircraft engine.
Now, I'm not sure how this translates into airline maintenance (part 121 ops)... Now, of course, whether this reg is put into practice is another issue altogether!!!!
Cheers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Don't think I've seen any aircraft being washed with pitot/static ports covered at my base (this includes most independant & charter operators as well as Big Airways).
Lubrication is only needed post-washing if the L/G or slat/flap mechanisms have been cleaned, washing all the grease out.
Lubrication is only needed post-washing if the L/G or slat/flap mechanisms have been cleaned, washing all the grease out.
Guest
Posts: n/a
FJW, KLMuk aircraft at ALL bases are washed regularly. However, the blue/white FK100 is more prone to soiling of the starboard vertical stabaliser than other aircraft in the fleet due to APU exhaust efflux. The yellow 146's and 737's look brilliant as the sun rises over deepest Essex, don't you think?
Guest
Posts: n/a
I don’t know whether its me but I think that you spot a whole lot more when you wash Aircraft especially when maintenance is being carried out.
I agree with Genghis “as a duty for pilots who have transgressed”.
“Remember Aircraft belong to the Engineers PILOTS ARE ONLY ALLOWED TO USE THEM IF THEY PROMISE TO BE Careful”
[This message has been edited by 100LL (edited 09 December 2000).]
I agree with Genghis “as a duty for pilots who have transgressed”.
“Remember Aircraft belong to the Engineers PILOTS ARE ONLY ALLOWED TO USE THEM IF THEY PROMISE TO BE Careful”
[This message has been edited by 100LL (edited 09 December 2000).]