Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

NDB/ILS/DME approach - what's the difference?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

NDB/ILS/DME approach - what's the difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2001, 15:06
  #1 (permalink)  
paraman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking NDB/ILS/DME approach - what's the difference?

OK, call me stupid, but I'm confused. What's the difference between an NDB/ILS /DME approach and the ordinary bog-standard ILS/DME?
An example is the one into Sumburgh.
 
Old 21st Jun 2001, 15:47
  #2 (permalink)  
Bally Heck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

OK Stupid.

An NDB/DME/ILS approach uses the NDB/DME procedure to position onto the LLZ. An ILS/DME without an attached VOR or NDB procedure is usually positioned by radar or possibly on a DME arc from another facility.

:-}
 
Old 21st Jun 2001, 16:41
  #3 (permalink)  
bookworm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

I'm struggling to find a procedure designated NDB/ILS/DME in the UK. Can you give an example?
 
Old 21st Jun 2001, 16:51
  #4 (permalink)  
bookworm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">OK, call me stupid, but I'm confused. What's the difference between an NDB/ILS /DME approach and the ordinary bog-standard ILS/DME?
An example is the one into Sumburgh.</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">Can you give an example?</font>
And you want me to call you "stupid?

It's entitled "NDB to ILS/DME" in the Aerads. However I can find no material difference between that and examples of "ILS/DME" with an NDB as the IAF.
 
Old 21st Jun 2001, 18:34
  #5 (permalink)  
FlapsOne
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Luton NDB/ILS/DME 26.
 
Old 21st Jun 2001, 20:03
  #6 (permalink)  
paraman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

OK, I was asking for that. The difference seems to lie in the labelling - i.e. if Aerad
says NDB to ILS/DME it all makes sense after all! I'd only seen the Jepps plate.
Ta.
 
Old 22nd Jun 2001, 11:36
  #7 (permalink)  
bookworm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

I'm not sure it does make sense, paraman!

The Sumburgh approach, labelled 'NDB to ILS/DME Rwy 27' uses the SBH NDB as an IAF and has a teardrop pattern to the localiser. It has optional DME arcs for 'direct arrivals'.

Cambridge has an 'ILS/DME Rwy 23' approach which uses the CAM NDB as an IAF and has a teardrop pattern to the localiser. It has optional DME arcs for 'direct arrivals'.

I can't detect a material difference in the nature of the procedures, yet one has a 'NDB to' in the title, and the other does not.

 
Old 22nd Jun 2001, 23:52
  #8 (permalink)  
Tinstaafl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Australia's 'Departure & Approach Procedures' ie Oz equivalent to UK Aerad & USA NOAS approach charts: If a navigation aid is used in the title then it is a required aid for the approach.

Can't remember if that applies to the Oz edition of Jepps or to Aerads, NOAS or local Jepp publications.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.