Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Transfering of registration between airframes

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Transfering of registration between airframes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th October 2023 | 21:58
  #21 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 67
From: Dublin, Ireland
The online register G-INFO now shows the "old" G-GBNI as G-GBNIX, to distinguish it from the current one.
Liffy 1M is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 07:01
  #22 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,738
Likes: 2,119
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by Liffy 1M
The online register G-INFO now shows the "old" G-GBNI as G-GBNIX, to distinguish it from the current one.
Yes, that's SOP, see previous posts.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 09:13
  #23 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 381
From: Hampshire
Slightly ironic that the current G-GBNI's former Bermuda reg VP-BTNP was previously allocated to an A319. Presumably G-GBNI had this temporarily when DVB Bank hadn't got a lease customer for it.

Last edited by SLXOwft; 5th October 2023 at 17:22. Reason: Correction of typo highlighted by Liffy1M
SLXOwft is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 11:28
  #24 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 67
From: Dublin, Ireland
Originally Posted by SLXOwft
Slightly ironic that the current G-GBNI's former Bermuda reg VP-BTN was previously allocated to an A319. Presumably G-GBNI had this temporarily when DVB Bank hadn't got a lease customer for it.
This source shows VP-BTP as a previous registration, VP-BTN currently being worn by an Azerbaijan A320N. Bermudan registrations are re-used anyway, so I'm not sure where the irony lies.
Liffy 1M is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 12:48
  #25 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 165
From: se england
Liffy-being very picky but the people on the island are like that -its BermudIan with a letter 'I' and said Bermudjan by most of them.

They had a mass cyber attack /ransome ware incident there last week could that impact their aviation registration business at. Also considering its a tiny place the airport is about 10% of the entire country, is registering aircraft in places like that just a financial device . Surely a G- reg gets more oversight than VP does?
pax britanica is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 13:34
  #26 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Originally Posted by pax britanica
Liffy-being very picky but the people on the island are like that -its BermudIan with a letter 'I' and said Bermudjan by most of them.

They had a mass cyber attack /ransome ware incident there last week could that impact their aviation registration business at. Also considering its a tiny place the airport is about 10% of the entire country, is registering aircraft in places like that just a financial device . Surely a G- reg gets more oversight than VP does?
Happens closer to home; 'M' reg are registered in the Isle of Man but only for 'private' aircraft some of which are not small; likewise a 'ZJ' reg is Jersey and following on, a '2' is Guernsey. Some of these are transferred from 'G' reg aircraft but some have been transferred from Bermuda or Bahamas reg. and both tend to be based in the UK rather than IoM or Jersey eg VPBLS (itself originally VRBLS), a PC12 owned by Mr B Schroder/Schroders Bank was based at Fairoaks and when 'M' registrations were introduced it was changed to MYBLS.
Corrected version

Last edited by chevvron; 5th October 2023 at 19:14. Reason: cock up
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 17:27
  #27 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 381
From: Hampshire
Originally Posted by Liffy 1M
This source shows VP-BTP as a previous registration, VP-BTN currently being worn by an Azerbaijan A320N. Bermudan registrations are re-used anyway, so I'm not sure where the irony lies.
Mea culpa. BTN was a typo, BTP was also used by an S7 Siberia A319. irony was probably the wrong word, I was mildly amused this was the second time the airframe has had a reused reg.
SLXOwft is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 17:39
  #28 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 381
From: Hampshire
Chevvron you have got your Iles Anglo Normands confused 2- is Guernsey. Jersey's register used ZJ- but closed in 2022 I believe only four aircraft were ever registered.
SLXOwft is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 19:10
  #29 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Originally Posted by SLXOwft
Chevvron you have got your Iles Anglo Normands confused 2- is Guernsey. Jersey's register used ZJ- but closed in 2022 I believe only four aircraft were ever registered.
Thanks, I'll change the above.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 5th October 2023 | 22:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 4
From: Yorkshire
Wasn't G-OCAA on more than one aircraft?

I guess it's one rule for us and another for them!


MJ
Mach Jump is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2023 | 04:03
  #31 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 15,201
Likes: 1,202
From: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Not according to G-INFO... owned by Lynton Aviation for 10 years between 1992 and 2002.
treadigraph is online now  
Reply
Old 6th October 2023 | 21:49
  #32 (permalink)  
UV
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 665
Likes: 8
From: Essex
Originally Posted by Mach Jump
Wasn't G-OCAA on more than one aircraft?

I guess it's one rule for us and another for them!


MJ
You may be thinking of G-CCAA which was registered to the CAA from December 1982 until September 1987.
UV is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2023 | 15:52
  #33 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 621
Likes: 137
From: UK
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
I stand corrected re the attachment of the letters, I hope the seamstresses aren't too disappointed.
Wrong thread.
pilotmike is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2023 | 16:54
  #34 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 15,201
Likes: 1,202
From: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Took me a moment to cotton on to that...
treadigraph is online now  
Reply
Old 8th October 2023 | 07:07
  #35 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,738
Likes: 2,119
From: Reading, UK
Don't let it needle you ...
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 8th October 2023 | 08:34
  #36 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 717
Likes: 44
From: In the real world.
I recall G-EASI being used on an Eastern Airways Shorts 330, the marks had previously been worn by a Vickers Vimy!


Jerbourg is offline  
Reply
Old 8th October 2023 | 08:48
  #37 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 15,201
Likes: 1,202
From: Too close to Croydon for comfort
I see G-EAGL was also reused. Alliance P2 Seabird, then a Cessna 421 (naturally!).
treadigraph is online now  
Reply
Old 13th October 2023 | 20:18
  #38 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 312
Likes: 36
From: Slough, UK
Seems the old G-GBNI (G-GBNIX) was involved in a serious incident departing Stansted post-government conversion back to regular Titan use. Current reg is G-OATW.

https://avherald.com/h?article=50faa50b&opt=0
champair79 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.