BA pilot upsets DUB ATC once again.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The address is missing a colon after the https.
Cut and paste, add a colon before // and it works.
edit: the link displayed is different to that embedded in the forum, i.e. "http://https//m.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qFUZ6oHBft4"
so https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=...&v=qFUZ6oHBft4 will get you there.
Cut and paste, add a colon before // and it works.
edit: the link displayed is different to that embedded in the forum, i.e. "http://https//m.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qFUZ6oHBft4"
so https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=...&v=qFUZ6oHBft4 will get you there.
Last edited by luoto; 20th Jun 2016 at 16:06. Reason: more info
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps the calm lady on ground ATC could file an etiquette report to BA about their Nigel taking up valuable & limited radio time over trivia. I've never heard of a pilot volunteering to write a report over minutiae. Writing any kind of report is a drudge, but when 'needs must' it is a responsibility to make changes where necessary. Volunteering to write one about trivia where nothing is going to change is a whinge of epic proportions. I wonder what example was being shown to the F/O (captain's apprentice). And the world still turns and no-one died. OMG.
Some might think that a pilot could reasonably get upset with a ground controller who has just cleared his flight to push back into the path of another aircraft, prevented only by a vigilant tug crew.
Except that Nigel didn't get upset, he simply pointed out calmly to the oblivious controller what had happened and informed her, not unreasonably, that he would be filing an ASR.
Or have I been listening to a different recording?
Except that Nigel didn't get upset, he simply pointed out calmly to the oblivious controller what had happened and informed her, not unreasonably, that he would be filing an ASR.
Or have I been listening to a different recording?
Pegase Driver
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks luoto for the amended link.
Well if I was the Dublin ATC head receiving such a report from BA, I would just copy and paste the audio file and write : "contact us if you have any further questions" .
But I bet you a pint of Guinness that no report was written in the end , it was just like a kid bravado after the other crew comments on the R/T to get the final word .
It is also apparently his own error to stop monitoring the frequency, if I get it correctly.
Anyway , kuddos to the girl for remaining quiet and professional all the way . I do not think I would have remained myself that polite until the end...
Well if I was the Dublin ATC head receiving such a report from BA, I would just copy and paste the audio file and write : "contact us if you have any further questions" .
But I bet you a pint of Guinness that no report was written in the end , it was just like a kid bravado after the other crew comments on the R/T to get the final word .
It is also apparently his own error to stop monitoring the frequency, if I get it correctly.
Anyway , kuddos to the girl for remaining quiet and professional all the way . I do not think I would have remained myself that polite until the end...
Last edited by ATC Watcher; 20th Jun 2016 at 16:26. Reason: adding a sentence
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In the countyside
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some might think that a pilot could reasonably get upset with a ground controller who has just cleared his flight to push back into the path of another aircraft, prevented only by a vigilant tug crew.
Except that Nigel didn't get upset, he simply pointed out calmly to the oblivious controller what had happened and informed her, not unreasonably, that he would be filing an ASR.
Or have I been listening to a different recording?
You missed the part where she said she tried to notify them of the other aircraft and they acknowledged they weren't listening out on frequency.
Except that Nigel didn't get upset, he simply pointed out calmly to the oblivious controller what had happened and informed her, not unreasonably, that he would be filing an ASR.
Or have I been listening to a different recording?
You missed the part where she said she tried to notify them of the other aircraft and they acknowledged they weren't listening out on frequency.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sorry, but I'm listening to something different then most of you.
I hear speedbird get cleared to push and start and then get stopped by vigilant groundcrew because somebody else in another aircraft f@cks up.
The Nigel might be an arse for blaming the ATC girl (clearly not her fault, she did well) , but he's right that that was potentially a bad incident, and a report should be written.
The other pilots on freq are being very unprofessional. Laugh in the cockpit, but don't clutter a busy freq.
I hear speedbird get cleared to push and start and then get stopped by vigilant groundcrew because somebody else in another aircraft f@cks up.
The Nigel might be an arse for blaming the ATC girl (clearly not her fault, she did well) , but he's right that that was potentially a bad incident, and a report should be written.
The other pilots on freq are being very unprofessional. Laugh in the cockpit, but don't clutter a busy freq.
A little late for the controller to advise of the conflict, methinks.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In the countyside
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Both pilots on the intercom? I'm sure it's not BA SOP for one pilot not to monitor a frequency they are working. I hope he did/does file his report. It will all come become clear for all concerned from there. I have a sneaky feeling however that there won't be any report written.
Even if the BA crew had been monitoring the ground frequency and had heard her warning, it still came after the vigilant tug crew had already stopped the pushback of their own accord when they became aware of the conflict. That situation should never have arisen.
I hope he did/does file his report. It will all come become clear for all concerned from there.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Under the bridge
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What would you suggest then ? Herself coming down from tower and tell them to stop ? Thatīs no reason for the BA pilot to blame her ... Couldīve handled that much differently, or was everyother pilot in the freq also wrong ?
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but he's right that that was potentially a bad incident, and a report should be written.
OMG: a BAD incident. If that was a bad incident and a report is necessary then some airlines must be drowned in paperwork. The poor guy who has to read and decide about all those reports. Airports used to be surrounded by trees until all those reports.
prevented only by a vigilant tug crew.
There are airports where the air-crew is given clearance to push & start and the vigilant tug-crew are responsible for the safe push. A crash was prevented by a vigilant push-back crew and ground-man. Isn't that exactly what they are for. Congrats for doing their job in the same way we prevent crashes every day even though being surrounded by threats of multiple proportions & varieties.
There is a tongue in a cheek somewhere, but let's get real and find a sense of proportion; Please. JFK, O'Hare, Boston, and most of African airports would be never get through the day.
OMG: a BAD incident. If that was a bad incident and a report is necessary then some airlines must be drowned in paperwork. The poor guy who has to read and decide about all those reports. Airports used to be surrounded by trees until all those reports.
prevented only by a vigilant tug crew.
There are airports where the air-crew is given clearance to push & start and the vigilant tug-crew are responsible for the safe push. A crash was prevented by a vigilant push-back crew and ground-man. Isn't that exactly what they are for. Congrats for doing their job in the same way we prevent crashes every day even though being surrounded by threats of multiple proportions & varieties.
There is a tongue in a cheek somewhere, but let's get real and find a sense of proportion; Please. JFK, O'Hare, Boston, and most of African airports would be never get through the day.