Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

China Airlines B747 Crash (Merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

China Airlines B747 Crash (Merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jun 2002, 10:44
  #161 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Global village
Age: 55
Posts: 3,025
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
5 posts above, AND a couple of pages back, Rice Whine, this was one of the possibilities floated by when "an encounter with severe weather" was mentioned.

Regardless of age, severe turbulence can have catastrophic effects on airframes and occupants, as controllability of the aircraft, in any of it axes, is almost certainly impossible.
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2002, 13:18
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
>posted by Rice Whine

Well??<

Expect to be reimbursed for WAGs after you have provided suffcient supporting facts and confirmed by real investigators.

We no longer reimburse for simple passing references, wet dreams and inuendos not supported by analysis or facts.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2002, 15:49
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Firehorse

I don’t think I agree with you. Seems to me that there is a lot of capability not requested by the Chinese. Several countries who have both the expertise and equipment could have been on the
scene the week of the accident, and using robotics, underwater submersibles, and personnel, the flight recorders could already be at the labs. Given the extend time of the abnormality shown by the radar, the recorders should shed considerable information on what happened, making their recovery a number one priority. Like the ocean, it is beginning to smell fishie.
wes_wall is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2002, 17:13
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumor....Rumor....anyone heard that the ROCAF (Republic of China Air Force) is missing an F-5 since the day of the accident? There is a rumor floating about a head on with a ROCAF F-5 (which would explain some debris moving opposite direction of radar track). I know, we should just wait and see, but...........
Shore Guy is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2002, 20:10
  #165 (permalink)  
747FOCAL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have heard they have fished a few pieces of it out of the water which is why they must be talking about it. Can't hide it now.
 
Old 17th Jun 2002, 20:17
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that theory doesn't fit the fact that an air-steward was found strapped into his seat!:o
lambchopboy is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2002, 05:00
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: STL
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CVR recovered.
bblank is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2002, 17:13
  #168 (permalink)  
747FOCAL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thats not what I am hearing.
 
Old 18th Jun 2002, 18:29
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Firehorse


Thank you for the reply. With respect, the recovery phase of this should have been straight forward. There is unfortunately history to fall back on, and proven procedural methods to aid in
recovery. Two of recent come to mind immediately. If the recovery process is driven out of concerned for (granted, very important) public relations, then the approach is erred to begin with. Body and personal effects recovery should be and remain totally divorced from those activities associated with the investigation. I admit that is a cold way to look at it, but life goes on. Lets be thankful that they have at least recovered one of the recorders, and hope that they will be sucessful with the other.

747FOCAL

Care to enlighten us on what you “are hearing,” and from what source?
wes_wall is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2002, 02:03
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Paradise...Huh?
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2nd "Black Box" found...reported on CNBC
maus-warra is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2002, 07:40
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reuters Company News
Taiwan recovers second black box of crashed jet

By Angus Chuang

TAIPEI, June 19 (Reuters) - Taiwan navy divers recovered on Wednesday the second "black box" from the China Airlines ews) jet that broke up in mid-air and crashed into the sea last month, killing 225 people, the Aviation Safety Council said.

Retrieval of the Boeing 747-200's watertight flight data recorder, which logs flight information, could help investigators determine why the Hong Kong-bound plane broke into four pieces at 30,000 feet (9,000 metres) and crashed into the Taiwan Strait.

The box was found on the sea floor about 300 metres (1,000 feet) from the cockpit voice recorder recovered on Tuesday, said safety council spokeswoman Tracy Jen.

"The two black boxes appeared largely intact, but it remains to be seen if the data is complete," Jen said.

"We hope to find out tiny bits of detail about what happened to the plane minutes before it broke up. It's the recorders' turn to speak."

Investigators have said, even with the recovery of the black boxes, it might take a year to determine the cause of the disaster -- the carrier's fourth fatal accident since 1994. Together, the accidents have claimed more than 650 lives.

Aviation experts have floated several theories for the crash, including metal fatigue, an internal explosion, a mid-air collision or a military accident.

U.S. experts who investigated the mid-air explosion of a Trans World Airlines Boeing 747 off New York in 1996 are in Taiwan to help investigate the crash.

The two recorders would be brought back to Taiwan from Penghu island, near the crash site, later on Wednesday for analysis, Jen said, adding that it would take about a week to find out the contents.

ANGRY RELATIVES

The data recorder from the older-generation Boeing 747-200 may not have gathered as much flight information as newer models, but its recovery was still crucial to the investigation, she said.

Grieving relatives have vented their anger at the government and the airline for both the carrier's poor safety record and for delays in recovering bodies from the May 25 crash.

Taiwan and foreign salvage teams have so far recovered 123 bodies and some 10 percent of the 23-year-old aircraft, which crashed about 20 minutes after takeoff from Taipei.

The chairman and eight other board members of the state-controlled China Aviation Development Foundation, which owns 71 percent of China Airlines, resigned last month in the wake of the accident.

The awkward ownership structure of the carrier -- the government appoints a majority of the board members of the foundation -- has been widely blamed for paralysing management and making safety reforms almost impossible.

The airline's shares have slid around one fifth since the crash. On Wednesday, China Airlines shares were down 0.77 percent at T$12.85 by 0223 GMT, in line with a 1.93 percent fall in Taiwan's main TAIEX (Taiwan:^TWII - News) index.
Shore Guy is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2002, 13:06
  #172 (permalink)  
747FOCAL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I understand your skepticism. Can you tell me that you are actually out there floating around helping look for wreckage? Although I will admit when I was first told, I thought to myself how would you ever find any part of a small fighter after smashing into a 747 and then going in the ocean?
 
Old 19th Jun 2002, 13:43
  #173 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747 man, I hope you will have the integrity to say "sorry, I was wrong", when the facts are finally revealed. There is no evidence whatsoever of a midair collision with a military fighter. However, if that is proven, I'll beat you to it with an apology. I have been in aviation too long to jump to conclusions without adequate proof of opinion. Cheers, HD.
HotDog is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2002, 14:16
  #174 (permalink)  
747FOCAL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I can see admitting I was wrong, but why the need for an apology? It's not like I ranted and stepped all over everybody's dignity with unprofessional comments aimed at embarassing a single person or group. But, if it is real important to you Yes I am big enough to admit fault and apologize.
 
Old 20th Jun 2002, 20:23
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,911
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Out of curiosity: now that the black boxes have been recovered are they already pouring out the wreckage ?

--alex
atakacs is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2002, 00:21
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: asia
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There were reports earlier that a member of the cabin crew had been found still strapped in.
Does anyone know if that also applies to the passengers?
stickyb is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2002, 04:54
  #177 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't read too much into the ISM being found strapped to his seat. It's a very short sector from Taipei to Hong Kong, he could well have been doing his necessary paperwork strapped into his seat or could have been adjacent to his seat when the upset commenced and had the opportunity to sit down and strap himself in. Best wait for the FDR results.
HotDog is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2002, 06:09
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: around abouts
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A voice of reason, here here Hotdog well said.
firehorse is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2002, 12:57
  #179 (permalink)  
widgeon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
errrrrr....... guess not
 
Old 22nd Jun 2002, 17:51
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any word on the status/condition of the FDR-CVR? Has it reached the lab yet? If the FDR is the same vintage as the aircraft, I guessing there are just a few parameters recorded....does anyone know what type of FDR?..........It's been very quiet.....
Shore Guy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.