Worldwide 787 fleet grounded!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: luton
Age: 56
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can this not be moved to a more suitable forum, At least then we might get some input from people with a bit of technical expertise instead of the normal spotter /sim half wits putting their halfbaked pennyworths in
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why don't you put some useful input yourself kevlarcarl/simonchowder/walterthesofty?
Anything you can contribute that's interesting? Go on?
Why this individual is allowed to continue cyber-bullying spotters is beyond me. He's been banned twice already and every post in here is just anti spotter. Just ban him mods come on!
For a 44 year old man he has the grammar and mentality of a ten year old.
Anything you can contribute that's interesting? Go on?
Why this individual is allowed to continue cyber-bullying spotters is beyond me. He's been banned twice already and every post in here is just anti spotter. Just ban him mods come on!
For a 44 year old man he has the grammar and mentality of a ten year old.
Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 10th Dec 2012 at 23:51.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: luton
Age: 56
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Calm down skippy, Im merely saying this is not really the best forum to discuss issues such as this far better on the techlog or engineers forum where the chance of uninformed knapsack and bino input is reduced
Last edited by walterthesofty; 11th Dec 2012 at 16:40.
Gnome de PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,627
Received 298 Likes
on
166 Posts
entire worldwide fleet? There can only be like 10 of them flying!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Calm down skippy, Im merely saying this is not really the best forum to discuss issues such as this far better on the techlog or engineers forum where the chance of uninformed knapsack and bino input is reduced
If you *really* thought that, one assumes you're clever enough to start your own thread in that forum and link back asking for professional input from engineers. I suspect your usual spotter baiting is the only reason. Every single post in this forum, clearly marked as "Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)" is patronising and detrimental. Given your past history of being banned twice, as kevlarkarl and then as simonchowder, I think you're lying.
You're just a little bully sniping at the margins Walter, haven't ever read anything from you to suggest otherwise. If I have time later I'll compile a Top 20 of your cheapest shots. It's easy to show your game for what it is. Playground nonsense from a bloke in his 40s.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: luton
Age: 56
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best ignore him, reacting only feeds his venom. He has some bee in his bonnet about me, constantly tries to get me banned for some reason ,thankfully the mods seem wise to him.
Im merely saying this is not really the best forum to discuss issues such as this far better on the techlog or engineers forum
That's how we managed to get to post #42 before we had your helpful contribution.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: stockport uk
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its no great suprise he has a bee in his bonnet (as many others on here do) about you really is it? you have been trolling on this forum for the last few years under the names of simonchowder, kevlarkarl, and now as walterthesofty.
biggest wum on pprune.
biggest wum on pprune.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As per below. I had enough of this rubbish at school, I don't think we should tolerate it as adults. He's got multiple profiles and form and yet he still gets to wind people up with impunity. There's loads more if you look. He's an unpleasant individual who trolls *only* in this thread with language which would see him sacked if he was to behave like this face to face with any colleague. I think it's right we challenge him.
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...ml#post7567678
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...ml#post7533943
http://www.pprune.org/airlines-airpo...ml#post7533935
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...ml#post7470450
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...ml#post7405206
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...ml#post7403506
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...ml#post7402398
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...ml#post6044997
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...ml#post7567678
instead of the normal spotter /sim half wits
make a few of these nutters think twice
the odd obsessed crank
the knapsack and bino brigade
Whatever you charge some of these types will always try to avoid paying which is why robust action by the police is required to reinforce the point airports are not spotter playgrounds
Sadly many spotters seem to think airports exist solely to enable them to collect reg numbers and do not seem aware of the chaos they cause
some of these anoraks are a total menace
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...ml#post6044997
a large amount of tosh posted by the clueless as that thread contains
Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 11th Dec 2012 at 23:25.
You can argue forever more whether somebody is a "wum" or not, it doesn't alter the fact that the OP shouldn't showed a complete lack of understanding of the AD process and shouldn't have produced the post that started this thread.
Without question the spotters ( and yes, I was one once at Ringway) are definitely the best folks to answer questions on..spotting. The technical stuff really is definitely better left for the pros...
Without question the spotters ( and yes, I was one once at Ringway) are definitely the best folks to answer questions on..spotting. The technical stuff really is definitely better left for the pros...
Last edited by wiggy; 12th Dec 2012 at 07:53.
And all inspections have probably been complied with by now anyways.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 5nm NE of EGTC
Age: 69
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wiggy
Without question the spotters ( and yes, I was one once at Ringway) are definitely the best folks to answer questions on..spotting. The technical stuff really is definitely better left for the pros...