G-DOCU - damaged at Genoa?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
G-DOCU - damaged at Genoa?
According to a report on another site, one of BA's 737-400s, G-DOCU, was badly damaged in a collision with a ground service vehicle at Genoa, to the extent that the cabin was cut open. Apparently it has not left there since (last week). Does anyone know any more about this incident? Haven't seen it on Aviation Herald ...
JetPhotos.Net Photo » G-DOCU (CN: 25854) British Airways Boeing 737-436 by John Fitzpatrick
JetPhotos.Net Photo » G-DOCU (CN: 25854) British Airways Boeing 737-436 by John Fitzpatrick
There's a reference to the incident, albeit of no relevance to the subject, in the third post of this thread:
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...-canceled.html
http://www.pprune.org/spectators-bal...-canceled.html
Join Date: May 2001
Location: South East
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
..and the truck driver..............?
SHJ
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Think it depends where you are.
I know one Gulf state where it is a no questions asked instant dismissal for any aircraft that is hit, no matter how minor.
Whereas a UK airport that I worked at the offender would be suspended and as long as complete negiligence isn't proven they would be retrained and have to sit the airside driving course again.
I know one Gulf state where it is a no questions asked instant dismissal for any aircraft that is hit, no matter how minor.
Whereas a UK airport that I worked at the offender would be suspended and as long as complete negiligence isn't proven they would be retrained and have to sit the airside driving course again.
Depends on your point of view.
Would you rather someone accidentally damages an a/c and walks away without reporting it because they know that to do so is instant dismissal or promote honest reporting, keep the job and stay safe?
I know which I would choose.
Would you rather someone accidentally damages an a/c and walks away without reporting it because they know that to do so is instant dismissal or promote honest reporting, keep the job and stay safe?
I know which I would choose.
I'm all for honest reporting, but really, if a job description involves maneuvering equipment around multi-million dollar aircraft then both training and oversight of the participants must be to the fore. However I take the point that as pilot you would want to know of any 'accidents' before getting the hull pressurised. Glad to see G-DOCU back in revenue service
SHJ
SHJ
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I used to fly this very plane 15 years ago. I identified the location and was pleased to see I was bang on. Interestingly enough in a subsequent small airline, one of the 737-700s suffered similar damage (but less widespread) in a towing incident at LGW when the tow truck turned and the 737 didn't. Took several weeks to organise, but a 10 man Boeing team came over and blitzed it in about 10 days, with Christmas coming to encourage them to get on with it. First rate job. I would think in DOCU's case, BA's team would easily accomplish it.
As for the insurance angle, it seems it's common for ground handlers not to fully insure in aviation to reduce the insurance element of ground handling cost, the airlines themselves accepting liability beyond that level. All in all, very shrouded in obscurity!
As for the insurance angle, it seems it's common for ground handlers not to fully insure in aviation to reduce the insurance element of ground handling cost, the airlines themselves accepting liability beyond that level. All in all, very shrouded in obscurity!