Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

9/11 And Inertial Navigation

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

9/11 And Inertial Navigation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Sep 2011, 18:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Altrincham
Age: 58
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
9/11 And Inertial Navigation

In response to a post on another forum, how would the hijackers of those aircraft which hit the WTC and the Pentagon been able to accurately home their aircraft into their targets without flying around making themselves obvious?

Could they have keyed the coordinates into the Inertial Navigation System and just flown in if they had the know how to do it or how would it have been done?


Or were they just so big they couldnt miss them?

Thanks lots
donnlass is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2011, 00:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See following for 'A Pilot's view' from 2001

The Hijackings: A Pilot's View

The theory put forward then was that the hi-jackers had taken the flights before. This was later confirmed by T. Carter who was an American Airlines Flight Attendant.

Scroll through to 11:11 for T. Carter on the following video link.

She reveals that some of the hi-jackers had conducted prior reconnaissance flights on the routes and had made video tapes as well as visiting the cockpits.

T. Carter - parapolitical investigator and 911 stewardess

In addition to prior intelligence gathering flights the hi-jackers obviously chose a fine weather day.
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2011, 00:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
donnlass

In theory they could have loaded a lat/long waypoint into the INS derived from a good chart and that would have put them within a couple of hundred yards of the WTC/Pentagon, I don't know if they did that or did not.

Given the weather I doubt they needed that accuracy.
wiggy is online now  
Old 12th Sep 2011, 02:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
DCT KJFK/KDCA and then take it visually from when you get close to Manhatten/DC.


The visual part is the tricky bit. The NY aircraft didn't have a problem spotting the twin towers. The aircraft that hit the Pentagon is thought to have had the Whitehouse as it's primary target. It circled DC for a while before going for the Pentagon. It's assumed the hijackers couldn't see the primary and went for the much more obvious Pentagon instead. It's also assumed the fourth aircraft had the Capital building as it's target.

Last edited by Dan Winterland; 12th Sep 2011 at 02:43.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2011, 21:36
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Altrincham
Age: 58
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all your replies everyone, they helped me make my point in question I was answering
donnlass is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2011, 14:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Herts
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isnt it obvious that the hijackers chose 9/11 because the weather was good and they could fly visually ?
rsuggitt is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.