Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Flybe E195 makes forced landing

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Flybe E195 makes forced landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Aug 2009, 20:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NI
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flybe E195 makes forced landing

just noticed this online, anyone know which reg it was or any info?

BBC NEWS | UK | England | Devon | Flybe plane makes forced landing

Last edited by bubblesqueaker; 10th Aug 2009 at 20:57.
bubblesqueaker is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 20:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well had it been tracking from C.I. to London it wouldn't have been anywhere near to EXT to make a 'forced' landing, whatever a forced landing may be.

Suspect that it was merely a technical diversion to Flybe's main engineering base for some unscheduled TLC and the press, as usual, are making a mountain out of a somewhat routine molehill.
Phileas Fogg is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 21:02
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NI
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no surprise there then! According to the updated story it was now going from LGW to CI? Hmmm!
bubblesqueaker is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 21:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In a control room with no radar...
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reg G-FBEC flight BE-953from Gatwick to Jersey... diverted to Exeter with 'flaps problem', landed safely and replacement aircraft dispatched to Jersey.

Lay off them, BBC, just after the non-event landing at Gatwick. Go report on the body discovered in a gear bay of an A320 in Vladivostok...
Scott Diamond is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 21:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Well had it been tracking from C.I. to London it wouldn't have been anywhere near to EXT to make a 'forced' landing, whatever a forced landing may be.

Suspect that it was merely a technical diversion to Flybe's main engineering base for some unscheduled TLC and the press, as usual, are making a mountain out of a somewhat routine molehill."

I'd argue it's safe to say that a 'forced' landing is a landing at an originally unintended airport for a reason that has nothing to do with the original destination. As for diverting to Exeter being "routine", I'm sure that's an added extra most passengers would be happy to forego.
Dave's brother is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 21:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it just me that gets constantly infuriated with the way these news agencies report something? When I read "Forced landing", I imagine it has gone down somewhere. Then when you read further on and see it was a "minor technical fault", it hardly constitutes a "forced landing" in my opinion.
Defruiter is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 22:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This Is Not A Forced Landing
adverse-bump is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 22:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was 'forced' to stop my car in a lay-by the other week to pump a tyre up ..... why wasn't this reported as headline news?

This had been an added extra that I would have been happy to forego!
Phileas Fogg is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 22:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: pietralunga
Posts: 169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree. Surely a forced landing involves being forced to land, now ! This was a diversion for a technical problem.
kms901 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 13:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The laws of physics force everything to land eventually, ergo, every landing is a forced landing.
Otto Throttle is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 14:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can vouch for the Flybe E195s diverting from Belfast City airport a couple of times due to hydraulic issues last year.

Nice aircraft though, flown on them once and caught a go around on video still..bring back the 146 i say
newtownards is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 14:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Nearer home than before!
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes Bring back the 146!

Let's see how much fun it would be paying through the nose for old fashioned, probably u/s on fitting parts to a 20 year+ old airframe, with outdated avionics/engines and systems, a fuel burn per seat /KM than the current fleet and no end of techical problems to solve weekly.

Don't get me wrong, I love the old 146 and enjoyed flying it for several years no end, but it's an old design, obscelecent and poorly supported and simply not the tool for today's fragile industry model.

You'd drown in parts costs and unreliability for starters.

Flybe are scrapping a lot of the old things because they are worth more as parts than flying machines...says it all really.

The E195 is a superb aircraft, modern and efficient, the Dash also for most of the routes it services. Without them, Flybe probably wouldn't be around in as good health as it is.

The BBC however, really needs to go find some proper News to fill it's time!
RVF750 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 14:56
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would i be right in saying one of the big flaws in the 146 fleet was that Flybe inherited them all with different layouts inside, making booking and passenger numbers a bit more tricky? Also all the stories of burning or nasty smells onboard, and a mercury spill on one aircraft.
newtownards is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 15:03
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know very well the media and spotters can't spell "precautionary".

Muppets.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 19:38
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chedburgh, Bury St.Edmunds
Age: 81
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
I can assure you that spotters [I am not one] can spell very much better than some of the Airline Pilots on here!!!!. Can't bring myself to use 'muppets'
JEM60 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 21:56
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Exeter UK
Posts: 280
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doomed jet plumets

See last night's post on the Exeter thread.
http://www.pprune.org/airlines-airpo...ml#post5116860
EGTE is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 22:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Manchester
Age: 53
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just my two pence worth, but it strikes me that a forced landing is one that involves some polite but firm commands to put it on the ground, backed up by the business end of a Tornado or two.

In cases like this I think it's up to crew/press officers/PR types to try and set the terms of the discussion. I'd call it a unscheduled landing.
Skyfan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.