Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Nose-down attitudes on the ground

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Nose-down attitudes on the ground

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Aug 2009, 14:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nose-down attitudes on the ground

Lately I've been wondering why I see so many jet aircraft, from bizjets on up, that seem to have a slight nose-down attitude while on the ground. Obviously the designers didn't forget to make the nose gear long enough, and it seems unlikely that the heaviest part of the aircraft is the nose, so it must be a deliberate design choice, but what's the advantage to it?

I thought of two possibilities, which might or might not make sense. One is that the nose-down attitude helps keep the aircraft on the ground during take-off, until the pilots explicitly rotate it. Another is that the nose-down attitude might be intended to cancel the angle of incidence in the wings, so that the effective angle of attack during forward motion on the ground is zero. I suppose these are variations on the same thing.

Not all jets appear to have this feature, and what's more confusing is that small prop aircraft seem to sit on the ground in a distinctly nose-up attitude.

What's the real reason for the nose-down position?
AnthonyGA is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2009, 17:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London
Age: 36
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may be wrong about this, but I seem to remember reading that the Dash-8 was designed with a slightly nose-down attitude on the ground to keep the door sill within a certain height off the ground. I think it was to avoid the need for emergency exit chutes to be installed.
shaun.s is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2009, 09:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Liverpoolish...
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A330 also appears very nose down...
Fernanjet is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 15:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kelsterbeach
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A330/A340 family is indeed nose down on the ground, and the reason is indeed that the nose gear is "not long enough". They were unable to fit a longer nose gear!
Reimers is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 16:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ask crewing
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Couple of possible reasons:

Keeps the deck angle at a more comfortable incline when in straight and level flight (airliners generally fly along with the wing at a positive angle of attack - +4 degrees ish).

Reduces the chances of a tailstrike on certain long types (the Dash 8 which you mention is a prime example).
FL370 Officeboy is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 18:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East of LGB
Age: 69
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Reimers

Check out the bubble on the forward lower fuselage of the A330 Freighter.

No need to lengthen the gear, just mount it lower.

PICTURES: First Airbus A330-200F shows off nose-gear blister fairing

Oddly enough, that looks like a frankentanker.
11Fan is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2009, 23:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston, MA USA
Age: 68
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nose gear

In some cases, it just might mean that the nose gear strut is underinflated. These struts vary in design but many are basically pistons that use air and oil under pressure to remain partially extended under the weight of the aircraft. Depending on temperature, leaks, and perhaps just how much air was added during the last service, they may be slightly low or high.

I should mention that usually nitrogen is used rather than air when servicing the struts because it does not promote corrosion as much as oxygen and the larger molecules don't leake around seals as fast. (Regular air is 80% nitrogen anyway so not really much difference)

Also, depending on the last landing and perhaps bouncing during taxi, sometimes the struts just settle a little high or low.
aflyer100 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2009, 05:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Dash-8 comment is correct. De Havilland (now Bombardier) initially designed the 8 with a slightly nose low attitude to remove the need for the slide. They have continued this through the Q400 and into the CRJ.
+TSRA is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.