Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

KLM 747 puzzling question!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th October 2001 | 03:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: gypsy
Cool KLM 747 puzzling question!

To whom can give a positive answer.

As an airline pilot I spend many aday building model airliners, to let the time pass!

I came across something very strange, one of my KLM 747's is registered as PH-BUJ, 747-300 and named "hudson". On investigation of all 747's produced and registered by Boeing not one matches PH-BUJ, there is a PH-BUI and PH-BUK and so on in the PH-BU_ series.

Further I went through the internet to view every KLM 747 photograghed, no PH-BUJ!

Does anyone recall a PH-BUJ or was the model I built just a registration freak?

Regards
Jumbo Mouse with some cheese
jumbo Mouse is offline  
Old 5th October 2001 | 05:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: YVR/Pacific Rim
Post

as an aside PH-BUF (as I recall) was lost at Tenerife in the 77 ground accident. Not sure about your answer though!
rustbucket732 is offline  
Old 5th October 2001 | 05:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 2
From: UTC +8
Exclamation

No such animal on the PH register. Click Here
GlueBall is offline  
Old 6th October 2001 | 01:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Portsmouth
Post

might be worth checking with one of our Dutch-speaking colleagues wether BUJ is a dutch swear word. This could be the reason why no PH-BUJ exists.
Mycroft is offline  
Old 6th October 2001 | 03:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Wet Coast
Arrow

Neither the Dutch nor the Swiss issued allocations containing 'J' for a long time. In the same way as there are no 'Q's in the UK.
Recently both have started running out of reggies (no more DVLA threads, please !) so Jays have started to appear in those countries.

There never was a PH-BUJ (would have been a 200SUD not a 300 BTW) and I don't have an old enough KLM list to show which one was 'Henry Hudson', which is now a 737.

[ 05 October 2001: Message edited by: PaperTiger ]
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 6th October 2001 | 18:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: underground
Cool

Does anyone out there remember the KLM
registrations PH-BUM & PH-*** around 1987/8

mysteriously disappeared

I think they were 747,but maybe DC10.

Any others out there in this vein ?
moleslayer is offline  
Old 6th October 2001 | 23:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: N51:37:39 W1:19:16 Feel free to use as a waypoint.
Post

Sometimes I am so sad that I scare myself

From my copy of JP Airline Fleets International 1986 (see what did I say sad sad sad )

Most of the B747's owned by KLM were named after great rivers, the exceptions being the combi versions being named after famous aviators and/or Dutchmen.

No sign of BUJ or Hudson however.

Fence now departs to sit in the corner and mumble to himself
Man-on-the-fence is offline  
Old 7th October 2001 | 19:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Portsmouth
Post

If it was in sequence, PH-BUJ would have been a 747-306 combi, and would probably been named after an aviator (BUI= Wilbur Wright; BUK= Louis Bleriot)
PH-BUM Sir Charles E Kingsford-Smith is still operated by KLM
Mycroft is offline  
Old 7th October 2001 | 20:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: underground
Thumbs up

Thanx Mycroft....

Any clues on PH-***
(rhymes with that well known chain of clothes shops FCUK)
moleslayer is offline  
Old 7th October 2001 | 22:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Wet Coast
Post

A very small point but like I said, BUJ would have been a 747-206B(M) SUD where SUD = stretched upper deck, ie. a retrofit. KLM had only two true 747-306s - BUV and BUW.

[ 07 October 2001: Message edited by: PaperTiger ]
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 8th October 2001 | 21:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: UK
Post

In 1979 Henry Hudson was DC-8 PH-DEF. There were 13 747's in service by that time with PH-BU* registrations.
Spotter is offline  
Old 9th October 2001 | 02:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands
Lightbulb

Once, a long time ago, I had a toy KLM 747 and I remember very well the registration was PH-BUJ. Since then I have seen more models with the same registration and, if I remember correctly, even a poster of this aircraft (not sure though!). The model I owned was one with a short upper-deck, I'm sure about that. (However toy manifacturers are not well known of their accuracy!)

About the meaning of the word BUJ: As far as I know there is none. So it's no swear or 'dirty' word. However, BUI means 'rainshower' and BUK means 'bend over' so maybe it should have ment anything .

The first 747 operated by KLM was registered as PH-BUA and named 'Mississippi' and the BUI and BUK are indeed named after aviators, so it would be very strange to put another river (Hudson) in between.

But, it's all speculating, I know! If you really want an answer, why don't you try asking KLM themselves? Link to their e-mailpage

Good luck!
Rog?!

[ 08 October 2001: Message edited by: Red or green?! ]

[ 08 October 2001: Message edited by: Red or green?! ]
Red or green?! is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.