Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Delta jet makes emergency landing in St. John's

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Delta jet makes emergency landing in St. John's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Aug 2007, 23:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: toronto
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Delta jet makes emergency landing in St. John's

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...824?hub=Canada

Searched all over web, for more info, not even on a.net, anyone, what was cause, resolution> thx in advance..
dash88 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2007, 04:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question

And for the big question: was this an ETOPS divert?
Airbubba is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2007, 13:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/D...119Z/KJFK/CYYT

Sure was a fairly dramatic turnaround... possibilities include a sick pax/crew member, a mechanical issue, or a security issue... (unruly pax or someone on the "no fly" list).
RobertS975 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2007, 14:36
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't think it was possible (4am arrival time) with a scheduled departure from JFK.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2007, 19:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Age: 70
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flew through YYT yesterday afternnon and there was a Delta 767 sitting on it's own away from the terminal, and another at the gate boarding for EGKK around 1500 local.

ex-egll
ex-EGLL is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2007, 20:30
  #6 (permalink)  
bnt
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin, Ireland. (No, I just live here.)
Posts: 733
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
The Globe & Mail says "engine problems" - no more than that.
bnt is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2007, 09:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: london
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
flight was mid atlantic & returned to St John's which explains the 4am arrival . said to be oil leak. DL9877 YYT-LGW picked up passengers
ff01 is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2007, 13:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to take a devil's advocate position, by what right does DL have to transport passengers from Newfoundland to LGW even if they arrived in YYT due to a DL diversion? I assume that the stranded passengers were never processed into Canada?

A silly technical point... thankfully, countries seem to look the other way in such instances.
RobertS975 is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2007, 20:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South of Watford
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Practically, it is just a continuation of the flight after a "tech stop". I don't expect any additional pax were loaded.
Sir Richard is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2007, 08:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RobertS 975
Assuming your Devil's Advocat question is serious....
all pax processed via Revenue Canada C&E, re-processed through TSA security screening, back onto a DL aircraft for continuation of their journey.
Delta are responsible for the transport of these passengers, pure and simple. It has nothing to do with landing 'rights' or the transport of passengers.

Willie
Willie Everlearn is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2007, 16:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re-processed through TSA security screening
Pedantry I know, but that would be CATSA.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2007, 17:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Willie, it was indeed a serious question, no attempt to be funny. It is interesting to hear that these folks were actually "admitted" into Canada before being put on their next aircraft.
RobertS975 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2007, 15:28
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was just googling around trying to see to what extent the diversion of flight DL001 from JFK to LGW had made the news around the world, and I was linked to this discussion on this board, so… I am going to provide some answers, since I happen to be one of the passengers!

First thing first, according to what we were told, a warning light turned on suggesting that an oil leak in an engine had been detected. The engine in point was therefore turned off and the crew was to turn around and fly back towards St. John’s.
Curiously enough – and I am sure some of you professionals may enlighten me on this – we were already two hours to the E of St. John’s over the Atlantic, meaning that London was about two hours and a half away, and Ireland probably even less, yet the decision went in favour of going back for about two hours.

Anyway, upon landing we remained on board for about an hour, whilst the Delta crew handled formalities which – as I understand it – came with this Delta flight not being normally expected in St. John’s. In the meantime, accommodation was sought and provided for the families with children. We - all the remaining passengers and myself - subsequently deplaned and had to undergo the usual immigration procedure – i.e. filling in the white custom form with personal data and answering the typical questions concerning the introduction of weapons, alcohol and tobacco into the Country and so on.
Our luggage remained with Delta – or possibly with Air Canada which we were told to turn to for any information – and was later on moved to the aircraft flying in from JFK in the early afternoon.
We were then free to use the airport facilities and some of us even left the airport for a couple of hours – Saint John’s airport is very nice, clean, light and comfortable, everyone working there was lovely with us, but after all spending the whole of 10 hours there would have been a tad too much…

So all in all I guess that answers some of your questions, doesn’t it?
andy_c76 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2007, 19:05
  #14 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certainly does, Andy- welcome and thanks for your information.
BOAC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.