Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

757 Fuel Flap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jul 2006, 02:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
757 Fuel Flap

A question for flight crew:

I was a passenger on a 757 about to take off from one of the Greek Islands a couple of weeks back. We had taxied to the end of the runway ready for take off. Strangely the flaps were then retracted and the Captain came over the pa to say that one of the cabin crew had noticed that the fuel filler flap on the right hand wing had popped open. We were returning to the terminal to get this closed. 10 mins later we were taxiing back down for take off. The Captain announced that this had been a "good call" by the crew member as had we got airborne this would have damaged the aircraft.

My question is this: how much damage would this realistically have caused? Would it simply have torn the flap off its hinges or worse could this have potentially caused a crash?

I'd be interested in your thoughts.
TimV is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 13:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flap would have been torn off
Brian Fantana is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2006, 13:49
  #3 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,889
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
In typical newsreader sensationalisim Mr Fantana

No it wouldn't! Every type I've flown has the refuelling panel "flap" hinged at the front. Therefore the resultant airflow would actually keep it closed. Correct me if I'm wrong here 757 chaps, but I assume the same can be said of the 757.

I suspect that the Captain, as I would, returned to stand in case any damage had occured prior to take off. As you can't see the panel from where I sit I'd want it looked at first...just in case.
Chesty Morgan is online now  
Old 17th Jul 2006, 12:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All the wing fueling station panels I've come across are hinged at the front, so in theory they will be held shut by the forward airflow. BUT when reverse thrust is applied, thats when dammage will proberbly occur. As for the flaps tearing them off, I'm not sure. The ones I've seen come mighty close so I won't risk flap operation with one open!!


Rgds Dr I
Dr Illitout is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2006, 10:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,504
Received 173 Likes on 94 Posts
Except the earlier A320s of course that ridiculously have it hinged at the top.

All good fun with the speed tape when one gets damaged or torn off.
TURIN is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2006, 15:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,251
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Front hinged, big over-centre spring. Would have blown mostly-shut. Little damage to be done although might have had some odd aerodynamic effects. Potable water and honey-wagon flaps are frequently left undone.

Standard call to ground crew for us goes....."Confirm all doors and hatches closed and secure...and all ground equipment removed from the aircraft..." but things still get missed!
blue up is online now  
Old 20th Jul 2006, 15:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: n/a
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
an air start panel on a lockheed electra caused a crash in the 80's

wiki

NY Times
Daysleeper is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2006, 17:49
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Daysleeper
an air start panel on a lockheed electra caused a crash in the 80's

wiki

NY Times
Read the NY Times link. Failure to fly the a/c caused the crash. Distracted by vibration from an open access panel. The panel didn't cause the crash.
misd-agin is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2006, 12:18
  #9 (permalink)  
NW3
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Farnham
Age: 42
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most likely all the fuel would have gushed out over a school and set on fire.

NW3
NW3 is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2006, 18:40
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would think it that would be extremely difficult to see the fuelling panel hanging down on the right wing leading edge, especially with the flaps/slats in the take-off configuration. I think a more likely explanation is that the over-wing gravity fill port had maybe popped open, then again though, you would have seen someone on top of the wing physically closing it, so who knows....
fescalised portion is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2006, 06:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Age: 74
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dr Illitout
All the wing fueling station panels I've come across are hinged at the front, so in theory they will be held shut by the forward airflow. BUT when reverse thrust is applied, thats when dammage will proberbly occur. As for the flaps tearing them off, I'm not sure. The ones I've seen come mighty close so I won't risk flap operation with one open!!
Rgds Dr I
I once met a B737 where the wing refuel panel had been left open on departure. The hold open rods were broken, but otherwise it was still intact.
On all Boeings, the Slats will move up and down and they miss the open refuel panel.
But leave an A320 refuel panel open and it will depart. They are hinged at the bottom and hang down when open. Nowadays if one is damaged we have to remove it and cover the hole with speedtape. Leaving it in place, covered with speedtape is not an option any more.
Swedish Steve is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.