Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Helios Crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th May 2006, 15:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helios Crash

Hello everyone...I'm new here so be gentle, i'm a lady!

I am not a pilot and I need help from some of you guys.

Basically, I am working on a docunmentary about the Helios plane crash that took place last year in Greece. Most of you might be aware of the accident and the surrounding facts/questions/accusations...

In a nutshell, this documentary tells the story of that tragic day and looks at all the facts in an investigative way. We don't think the pilots are to blame at all and we are trying to understand what could have happened on that plane and what are the main factors we should look at.

I would like to get in touch with THE British pilot who used to work for Helios and who flew the doomed plane on the day before the crash OR for any witnesses who could confirm to me that on the previous day there were some problems with the aircraft as reported by the crew.

If anyone can help or give me information on this I would be very greatful!
flying-bird is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 15:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,786
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
If:-

we are trying to understand what could have happened on that plane
Then why have you decided:-

We don't think the pilots are to blame
BEFORE you:-

looks at all the facts in an investigative way.
As for:-
be gentle, i'm a lady!
I think you'll find that gutter-living journos here to do stich-ups without knowing what the hell they are talking about are about as welcome as a fart in a spacesuit!!!


Oh... Welcome to PPRUNE!!
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 15:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll be gentle because you are a lady and I'm a nice guy!

I'm sure I speak for many people when I say that this really is an inappropriate use of this web site/BB and I would be very surprised to see any professional pilot contact you following your posting.

May I gently suggest that you use your other journalistic resources to try and get your information.
FlapsOne is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 16:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Anybody with a story to sell is not going to get any cooperation from a knowledgeable source. However if you have developed/discovered new facts not previously considered by the investigating parties, then I'm willing to listen and suggest other avenues to follow.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 16:47
  #5 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am a former professional test pilot who has no connection with the Helios accident.

I am posting just to say that the kindest possible reading of your post is that you are inexperienced (as opposed to trying it on).

If you really are inexperienced then I would counsel that you do a good search of accident related posts on PPRuNe as this will enable you to realise how the aviation community has been very badly served in the past by inaccurate, unbalanced and sensationalist reporting.

So much damage has been done over the last decade in this respect that it is hard to see how somebody – even if they genuinely want to do a decent balanced programme – will be able to win back the confidence of those who could help.

While a face to face meeting might - just might - persuade an insider that your intentions are honourable a BB approach will only be seen as reason to suspect the worst.
John Farley is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 17:37
  #6 (permalink)  

aka Capt PPRuNe
 
Join Date: May 1995
Location: UK
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is plenty of discussion of the incident in these two threads:

Cypriot plane crashes in Greece

Cypriot airliner crash to re-enacted

When you've trawled through those you may not even want to come back here to make your request but if you do, then you may get a bit more co-operation... depending on how you take the comments above and below.
Danny is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 17:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: third rock from the sun
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Investigations are done by a transportation safety board, or air accident investigation team. Journalist (generally) try and come up with a sensational story that will sell. Technical stuff (the truth) doesn't sell so is not printed. In other words, as far as I am concerned, miss, please stop posting on a PROFESSIONAL PILOT´S network, you are not welcome, full stop!
fortuna76 is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 17:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
"Hello everyone...I'm new here so be gentle, i'm (sic) a lady!".

What a bl**dy joke; haven't you folks in the media ever heard of sexual equality? Why should you be treated any differently?

I wish you luck in your attempt at intelligence gathering dear but I don't exactly think you are off to a racing start.
JW411 is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 18:00
  #9 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would suggest searching for the Toronto Star's reportage on Air France 358, including their "investigation", and then doing the opposite. There is probably a link buried somewhere in the threads here on pprune, but is probably behind a paywall by now so you'll have to reach for the company credit card.

As has been pointed out above, don't use the word investigation as this will in the mind of the public put you on the same level as the relevant investigative authorities with uncensored access to FDR/CVR etc. etc. etc. when you will not have much more than whatever leaks and chinese whispers are floating around the Aegean.
MarkD is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 18:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Middle Drawer
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't normally post on this forum but today must to support the previous 8 posters.

Although I am not a Professional Pilot, I am a Professional Aircraft Engineering Technician, but I do not like either Aircrew or groundcrew being dragged through the scrubber via ill researched information. Sensationalist witnesses unfotunately drub our brethren with no substantive knowledge of aviation, aircraft, the people involved and belittle our community by misleading people such as yourself.

Flying Bird, If you must investigate, You must ask the relevant authorities and not these forums.

Sorry, Take care.

Talk Wrench

Last edited by Talk Wrench; 11th May 2006 at 18:44.
Talk Wrench is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 18:49
  #11 (permalink)  
UP and Down Operator
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Miss Flying Bird.

If you really are genuine about wanting to make an objective report based on fact about the crash, then i will suggest that you make a documentary about yourself. You will be the first reporter that is not fussed about selling, but who just "want the truth".

Sorry, but i think you will find that professional pilots only will talk to professional investigation boards if they have vital information about an incident or accident. History has proven that it is best that way

Good luck

Last edited by UP and Down Operator; 11th May 2006 at 20:26.
 
Old 11th May 2006, 20:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Miss Bird

I have to agree with my more experienced ppruners, experience shows us that journalists are very rarely interested in reporting facts objectivley, there is more money to be made by sensationalising things and pointing fingers at those ill equipped to defend themselves.

The majority of states comply with the requirements of ICAO Annex 13 and have an AIB set up with sufficient experience and expertise to make sense of the tangled web of facts that leads to the loss of an aircraft. Their reports are factual, don't (usually) apportion blame, and make recommendations to prevent it happening again, which surely is the whole point. If you want a balanced, factual viewpoint try talking to the Greek AAIB, instead of courting comment from this forum.

I have yet to see any piece of journalism or tv documentary which has made any contribution to air safety.
unstable approach is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 20:19
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Miss Flying Bird,
The three previous posts will indicate why you have come to the wriong place. Talk Wrench hit the nail on the head just before that. For every opinion there will be a counter-opinion, you'll not be able to filter the wright from the rong (sic). That'll provide you with the (professional-pilot-guided) leeway for your story to follow any eye-catching and most newsworthy path, if you hadn't realised already......
Someone will now disagree with what I have said perhaps; lets see.
peterperfect is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 21:37
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Confusio Helvetica
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh come on. No journalist worth any salt is going to be satisfied with "ask your government what happened." And besides, it's not that hard to spot a wannabe talking crap, is it?
All you need is some basic training in how to do your research. Since this is technically an anonymous forum, you'd be a moron, the Cyprus Daily Mail, or any number of other journals to cite this forum, wash your hands, and declare the day is over.
Oh wait.
Here's a hint to the journalists: I'm not a pilot, nor do I work in the industry; the only time I've ever been accused of something like that was when I used the phonetic alphabet on L1 pax support.
Do I think there's an engaging story to be told about the Helios incident? Well, contrary to the professionals here, I do. And I think it has nothing to do with that old hackneyed play to the audience's fears, "there's nobody beyond that locked door watching out for us." (By the way, if you must take that angle, please make it metaphorical and political, with plenty of cross cuts to foreign and domestic policy missteps)
The real Helios story is how very few in positions in power, particularly in the Mediterranean world, can face a chaotic world, where simple human oversights, technical niceties, and dumb luck occasionally combine to produce disaster. As Aristotle said, there can be no science of the accidental; the post-Byzantine world's response is to claim that the accidental does not exist. Thus a simple tragedy becomes a political football in Greece and Cyprus: the opposition party blames the current government; the current government blames the opposition party, back when they were in power. Meanwhile, the conspiracy nuts, who cannot stand the idea that anything happens without meaning, weigh in with even worse conspiracies.
The crash is less than a year old, and it's second only to Itavia in terms of conspiracy theories and sheer crap that's been generated. There have been so many press opinions, official leaks, non-official non-leaks, parliamentary investigations, and who knows what else, that, to be honest, there is no chance in my mind that any worthwhile technical observations will come out of this. For that matter, odds are we will probably never know the "truth" of the incident. Tsolakis may surprise us on this one, though.
There's no point in trolling here. Besides, proper journalism involves contacting people personally, not generally. A general post like that will only get you the most extreme nutcases of the previous discussions: go ahead and read them -- there are some scary types around here.
Oh yeah, right. The truth doesn't sell; fear does.[/rant]
DingerX is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 21:39
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Middle Drawer
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Top one Dinger

I will say it for you.

RANT ON.

RANT OFF.

TW
Talk Wrench is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 22:05
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Retired to Bisley from the small African nation
Age: 68
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you want to start understanding the most basic issue, find a decompression facility that is prepared to take your money and go experience hypoxia in all its insidiousness.

I agree with all the posts so far - anyone thinks I am encouraging too much say so and I will delete.

Sven
Sven Sixtoo is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 22:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DingerX
Oh come on. No journalist worth any salt is going to be satisfied with "ask your government what happened." ...
There are a few governments that none of will accept as honest brokers in accident investigation.

If flying-bird really wants something close to the truth, she might take a look at the professional aviation press. They aren't perfect, they may have axes to grind, they've certainly got rags to sell, but they are the closest thing we have to a complete story.

Most of these folks at least have professional licenses and writing skills, and may take the time to explain the not-so-obvious; if you don't understand the jargon, you are sure to jump to the wrong "answer".
barit1 is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 22:47
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect that by the time you finish your research and make the program the official report will be released. Best wait for that.
cwatters is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 23:06
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: South East UK
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Frankly I'm almost lost for words to express my disgust at some of the moronic and childish tantrums which have been thrown here.

What happened to basic courtesy? You know nothing about this woman's integrity or background - yet you presume to know it all. Heaven forbid that you should let facts get in the way of your judgement.

You b!tch about journalists being hysterical, sensationalist, biased, ignorant, inaccurate, rude and ill-informed, and yet virtually all the responses to this lady's polite question so far have demonstrated that the posters have all those qualities, in spades.

Danny appears to be the only person who's actually been prepared to make the effort to stand up for the word 'professional' on this forum.

As for those of you who've behaved with the manners I'd expect from a gang of howler monkeys, I think you're a disgrace. You make the teenage taunting and bickering on Airliners.net seem like civilised debate.

If the lady in question is genuine (and I've no evidence to the contrary) then I hope she treats you with the utter contempt you deserve and obtains the help she's seeking from more reliable, more professional, more mature sources elsewhere.
Kalium Chloride is offline  
Old 11th May 2006, 23:20
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KC
How do you knw that "Flying Bird" is a woman? Please tell me the secret.
watp,iktch
chiglet is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.