An148 tested in very cold conditions
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An148 tested in very cold conditions
Down to-51 deg C!
http://www.antonov.com/news/index.xm...s_20060201.xml
I think it's a very nice aircraft!
http://www.antonov.com/news/index.xm...s_20060201.xml
I think it's a very nice aircraft!
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a very nice twin engined BAe 146! They've got a very nice BAe ATP as well, but they can keep that. I think they have a very nice B757 too. And a very nice Lockheed Galaxy, and a very nice B727........ (sound of cosh hitting head)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: U.K.
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are still a reasonable number of light aircraft manufacturers that make bi-planes. E.g. Aviat Aircraft still make the Pitts Special aerobatics bi-plane.
While I know that there have been quite a few different variants, are there any other planes that have been in production longer than the Pitts Special (61 years)? I know the Piper Cub might count if the Super Cub is considered a variant, rather than a new design?
While I know that there have been quite a few different variants, are there any other planes that have been in production longer than the Pitts Special (61 years)? I know the Piper Cub might count if the Super Cub is considered a variant, rather than a new design?
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Still in the Midland Radar overhead
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rainboe
It's a very nice twin engined BAe 146! They've got a very nice BAe ATP as well, but they can keep that. I think they have a very nice B757 too. And a very nice Lockheed Galaxy, and a very nice B727........ (sound of cosh hitting head)
B757 too. possibly Illyushin/Tupolev not Antonov
very nice Lockheed Galaxy Ok AN124 only larger than C5
and a very nice B727 Illyushin/Tupolev again poss Yakolev not Antonov
VEEPS