Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Are Boing gonna build the BIG mumma?

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Are Boing gonna build the BIG mumma?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jul 2005, 08:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Not NZ anymore sadly!
Age: 62
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are Boing gonna build the BIG mumma?

Momentum is building for a go-ahead for the 747-ADV program.Last week, Boeing posted a firm but unannounced order for six more 747s--thought to be 747-400Fs--on its website. Executives indicated at the recent Paris Air Show that the company had secured enough orders--30--to carry 747 production through to the first 747-ADV in 2009. Not surprisingly, sources suggest that the customers for the 30 are also launch customers for the 747-ADV.

Boeing executives also said they have seen widespread interest in the 747-ADV for both the passenger and cargo version.
1279shp is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2005, 11:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It looks likely that they will, but even if they do, the new aircraft won't be much larger than the current -400. Indeed, the last I heard was that the 747A freighter is longer than the pax model. It wasn't quite clear to me why they would go with only a slightly longer model, when a minor reconfiguration might give them more J/F class seats. That said, of course, the new aircraft should allow a significant gain in range.
akerosid is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2005, 05:45
  #3 (permalink)  
Kiwi PPRuNer
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: rockingham, western australia
Age: 42
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i seem to recall about 10yrs back the md-12 been mooted, only problem is it is the same if not similar to the a380, were there any airbus design engineers going thru the trash cans at long beach after boeing moved in???, surely a double decker 747 is possible, if not one with an extended upper deck,
ZK-NSJ is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2005, 14:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1 + 1 + 6 = 8

8 - 5 = 3

3 firm orders for 747s through June 28, 2005: http://active.boeing.com/commercial/orders/index.cfm

So where are the rest of the orders?
rotornut is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2005, 17:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Two factors here.
One, Boeing still sees the market as quite small - 20 aircraft a year. This means they can't see themselves recovering a large investment in the Advanced. Result: a modest stretch + the 787 engines (GE only to save $) + some material changes + new wingtips. Gives you 777-300ER range and 25 per cent more seats than the 777-300ER.
Two, the 747 market is healthy enough to continue production - but that is in part a result of a rising market overall, combined with the fact that you can't get an A380 before 2010; and I'd bet that UPS and FedEx have A380F slots locked up longer than that.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2005, 16:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
+ 6 = 9

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/...r_050705g.html
rotornut is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.