Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Engine Types

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2005 | 08:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: UK
Engine Types

Could somebody explain the differences and therefore advantages of a gas-turbine - propeller a/c over an aircraft with just a gas-turbine engine.

It doesn't make sense (to a non-aviator at least) to stick a propeller onto essentially a jet engine!

Cheers
+'ve ROC is offline  
Old 7th May 2005 | 10:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Turbo-prop's attain a higher efficiency at a lower airspeed. I think peak (+80% efficiency)is about 350 to 400 knots.

So for companies operating, let's say, short regional hops where max speed isn't an issue, it makes sense and saves fuel money.
PIGDOG is offline  
Old 10th May 2005 | 01:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: UK
It is all about efficiency. The alison engine that is used in lots of helicopters would have a hard time producing enough thrust to get it off the ground without a rotor. The way a lot of turboprops work is by directing the exhaust from the gas turbine over a power turbine that turns a shaft which goes into a gearbox and then turns the prop. I beleive the major reason turboprops are not built to go fast is due to the compresibilty problems of propellors at high speed (they become very poor at producing thrust). Modern airline engines such as the RR trent are not just jet engines pushing out thrust from their exhaust to make the plane go forwards. The big fan stuck on the front (the one you can see when you look at the front of an engine) acts like a propellor and is the component that produces most of the thrust at low altitudes. As the aircraft climbs the thrust percentage switches to most of it comming from the exhaust of the gas turbine rather than the fan. That is why they are called turbofan engines. It is a compromise between a pure jet which is good at high altitudes and a turboprop which is good at low altitudes. Turboprops do not need to be able to produce thrust from the gas turbine because they never go high or fast enough. They usually stay where a propellor is more efficient. Pure jets at low altitude are very inefficient. Jet fighters use them however because they need to go faster than you could with a prop although lots of them now have low bypass turbofan engines. Airliners mainly have high bypass turbofan engines which means there is a lot of air that bypasses the gas turbine. Look it up on google they will have pictures and give a better explination.

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/aturbp.html

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/aturbf.html
Scoob is offline  
Old 13th May 2005 | 14:02
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: UK
Ah - it becomes clear(er)!

Much appreciated
+'ve ROC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.