Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Boeing 787 - Final Design

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Apr 2005, 15:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Age: 48
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing 787 - Final Design

Not sure if these have been seen here yet.

Boeing have finalised the design for the 787 Dreamliner, and it looks a little different from previously. Fatter, stumpier and a more conventional looking tail.

787-3



787-8



787-9



Scary front view!



Pictures are from Boeing
eal401 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2005, 15:22
  #2 (permalink)  
DH1
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, is the 787-3 a shorthaul version with winglets, while the -8/9 versions are longhaul with swept wingtips?

Overall, looks remarkably like an airplane. Nice paint job though.
DH1 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2005, 15:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: EGCC
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I take it that the front view is of the 787-8. I’m a bit surprised that the 787-9 doesn't have winglets and the winglets on the 787-3 are not the curved style like the 787-8.

I know what you mean about it being fatter!

Jay
jay_hl is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2005, 16:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The upright winglets are just an option to keep the wingspan down at certain airports where parking is a problem.
Konkordski is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2005, 16:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks quite nice

Its lapping up the orders. AC announced and AI a signature away....seems more and more evident that Airbus' POS A350 needs re-evaluation, unless EK orders it soon then its mission accomplished for Airbus.
Bmused55 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2005, 16:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: On the sunny side of the street
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks more like a 767 everyday
Kingsnake is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2005, 16:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: South East UK
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm just waiting for the howls of outrage from the spotter community who'll no doubt be protesting that Boeing has sold its soul by trading the "cool" shark design for, God forbid, an economical aircraft that will appeal to airlines.
Kalium Chloride is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2005, 16:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kingsnake: Looks more like a 767 everyday
So what? If thats the shape that performs the best then thats the shape they should use. Looks mean nothing, economics and performance are what counts
Bmused55 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2005, 06:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Attic
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bmused55: Why did Boeing get our hopes up then if all they are going to build is a composite 767 with new engines and new wings?
A-FLOOR is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2005, 19:46
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is so naive I'm not even gonna explain.
Bmused55 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.