Props into Heathrow
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
Well, I'm going to reply anyway 
Interesting. Our Part 2 says that our departure separations are minima and not to be eroded for any reason , except where the application due to differing speed groups would result in excessive separation (ie, F50 on a DVR followed by a 737 on a DVR - we should give you five minutes)
Nothing is actually in our Part 2 about phoning up for two mintues.
Ooops, maybe I shouldn't have said that!
Interesting. Our Part 2 says that our departure separations are minima and not to be eroded for any reason , except where the application due to differing speed groups would result in excessive separation (ie, F50 on a DVR followed by a 737 on a DVR - we should give you five minutes)
Nothing is actually in our Part 2 about phoning up for two mintues.
Ooops, maybe I shouldn't have said that!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
AC2
Small point, but it's actually OUR service provision because, unless I'm very much mistaken, NATS pay your wages too.
Your Them/Us attitude is exactly the one that most OJTIs spend valuable hours trying not to get trainees to take on. Posts like yours remind us why - thanks.
P7
Small point, but it's actually OUR service provision because, unless I'm very much mistaken, NATS pay your wages too.
Your Them/Us attitude is exactly the one that most OJTIs spend valuable hours trying not to get trainees to take on. Posts like yours remind us why - thanks.
P7
