Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Space Flight and Operations
Reload this Page >

Space X - Successful launch then boom

Wikiposts
Search
Space Flight and Operations News and Issues Following Space Flight, Testing, Operations and Professional Development

Space X - Successful launch then boom

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Apr 2023, 17:17
  #1 (permalink)  
See and avoid
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 691
Received 55 Likes on 27 Posts
Space X - Successful launch then boom

https://www.space.com/spacex-starshi...il-2023-photos

SpaceX's Starship did not disappoint on its first test flight.The 394-foot-tall (120 meters) Starship, the world's biggest and most powerful rocket, took off from SpaceX's Starbase facility in Boca Chica, Texas at 9:33 a.m. EDT (1333 GMT; 8:33 a.m. local Texas time) on April 20, 2023. Powered by 33 Raptor engines, Starship roared through the morning sky to the delight of spectators gathered on nearby South Padre Island.

Starship didn't fly for long, however. The massive stainless steel vehicle apparently encountered an issue separating from its Super Heavy rocket booster a few minutes into its flight. After tumbling through the air, the huge rocket exploded in what SpaceX calls a "rapid unscheduled disassembly" just under four minutes after launch.
visibility3miles is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2023, 17:24
  #2 (permalink)  
See and avoid
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 691
Received 55 Likes on 27 Posts
Apparently 6 of the 33 engines weren’t firing during lift off, then when the first stage didn’t separate, it kept firing and the engines weren’t cut off.

More details should follow.
visibility3miles is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2023, 17:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Yakima
Posts: 592
Received 215 Likes on 85 Posts
Originally Posted by visibility3miles
Apparently 6 of the 33 engines weren’t firing during lift off, then when the first stage didn’t separate, it kept firing and the engines weren’t cut off.

More details should follow.
Yes, the unlit engines were very visible during stern shots of the ascent.
Winemaker is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2023, 17:29
  #4 (permalink)  
See and avoid
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 691
Received 55 Likes on 27 Posts
But, watching the video, maybe they weren’t supposed to light until later?

Actually, they were all supposed to work.

Still, the first stage was meant to detach.

”The goal was to gather information.”
visibility3miles is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2023, 17:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vendee
Posts: 145
Received 36 Likes on 20 Posts
I'm a bit confused. Musk’s employees were cheering when the rocket came to grief. I understand it was an achievement for the engines to hoist it from the pad, but it exploding certainly was not anticipated. Seems a rather expensive proof of concept.
Uncle Fred is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2023, 17:53
  #6 (permalink)  
Chief Bottle Washer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: PPRuNe
Posts: 5,189
Received 192 Likes on 119 Posts
Discussion here; SpaceX flight testing in South Texas
Senior Pilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.